Swing Riots

The Swing Riots were a widespread uprising by the rural workers of the arable south and east of England in 1830. The rioters, largely impoverished and landless agricultural labourers, sought to halt reductions in their wages and to put a stop to the introduction of the new threshing machines that threatened their livelihoods. They reinforced their demands not only with riots in which objects of perceived oppression such as workhouses and tithe barns were destroyed, but also with more surreptitious rick-burning, the destruction of threshing machines and cattle-maiming. The first threshing machine was destroyed on Saturday night, August 28th, 1830. By the third week of October, over one hundred threshing machines had been destroyed in East Kent.

The name Captain Swing was appended to several of the threatening letters sent to farmers, magistrates, parsons, and others. The "Swing letters" were first mentioned by The Times on the 21 October. Captain Swing has never been identified, and many people[who?] believe that he never existed, having been created by the workers as a fictional figurehead who could function as a safe target for their opponents.[original research?]

The Swing Riots had many immediate causes, but were overwhelmingly the result of the progressive impoverishment and dispossession of the English agricultural workforce over the previous fifty years, leading up to 1830. The anger of the rioters was directed at three targets that were seen as the prime source of their misery: the Tithe system, the Poor law guardians, and the rich tenant farmers who had been progressively lowering wages while introducing agricultural machinery.


[edit] Background to the uprisings

Early nineteenth century England was virtually unique among major nations in having no class of landed smallholding peasantry. The parliamentary enclosure movement of the previous century had eradicated the last rights of poorer countryfolk to graze their livestock, be it cattle, sheep, chicken or geese, on what had formerly been "common" land. The common grazing of older times was divided up among the large local landowners, leaving the landless farmworkers solely dependent upon offering their labour to their richer neighbours for a cash wage. Whilst this may have offered a tolerable living during the boom years of the Napoleonic wars, when labour had been in short supply and corn prices had been high, the coming of peace in 1815 brought with it plummeting grain prices and an oversupply of labour.

The social status of agricultural workers had also declined. In the 1780s workers would be taken on at annual hiring fairs, to serve for a whole year. In this period the worker would receive payment in kind and in cash from his or her employer, would often work at his side, and would commonly share meals at the employer's table. As time went by the gulf between farmer and employee widened. Workers were hired on stricter cash-only contracts, which ran for shorter and shorter periods. At first monthly terms became the norm; later contracts were offered for as little as a week at a time. Farm labourers were thrown on to parish relief the moment that their services were no longer profitable. The resulting insecurity of rural labourers was a major precursor to the 1830 riots.

The "Old Poor Law" introduced in Tudor times began to break under the strain. The system charged a "Parish Rate" to landowners and tenants, which was used to provide relief payments to settled residents of the parish who were ill or out of work. These payments were minimal, and at times degrading conditions were required for their receipt. As more and more people became dependent on parish relief, ratepayers rebelled ever more loudly against the costs, and a lower and lower level of relief was offered. Three and a half "one gallon" bread loaves were considered necessary for a man in Berkshire in 1795. However provision had fallen to just two similar-sized loaves being provided in 1817 Wiltshire. The way in which poor law funds were disbursed led to a further reduction in agricultural wages, since farmers would pay their workers as little as possible, knowing that the parish fund would top up wages to a basic subsistence level (see Speenhamland system).

To this mixture was added the burden of the Church tithe. Originally this had been the Church's right to ten percent of the parish harvest. However the earlier collection of goods in kind had been replaced by a cash levy that was payable to the Church of England Parson, and which went to pay his (often considerable) wages. The cash levy was generally rigorously enforced, whether the resident was a Church member or not, and the sum demanded was often far higher than a poor person could afford. Calls for a large reduction in the tithe payment were prominent among the demands of the rioters.

The final straw was the introduction of horse-powered threshing machines, which could do the work of many men. They spread swiftly among the farming community, threatening the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of farmworkers. Following the terrible harvests of 1828 and 1829, farm labourers faced the approaching winter of 1830 with dread.

[edit] The riots

Horse-powered threshing machine

Starting in the south-eastern county of Kent, the Swing Rioters smashed the threshing machines and threatened farmers who had them. The riots spread rapidly through the southern counties of Surrey, Sussex, Middlesex and Hampshire, before spreading north into the Home Counties, the Midlands and East Anglia. Moving on as far as Lincolnshire, Yorkshire and Nottinghamshire.

Threatening letters, often signed by Captain Swing, would be sent to Magistrates, Parsons, wealthy farmers or Poor Law Guardians in the area. The letters would call for a rise in wages, a cut in the Tithe payments and for the destruction of threshing machines, otherwise people would take matters into their own hands. If the warnings were not heeded local farmworkers would gather, often in groups of 200 - 400, and would threaten the local oligarchs with dire consequences if their demands were not met. Threshing machines would be broken, workhouses, tithe barns and other buildings would be attacked and the rioters would disperse or move on to the next village. Despite the prevalence of the slogan "Bread or Blood", not one person is recorded as having been killed during the riots, whose main intent was to damage property. The burning of barns and hayricks took place in parallel to the riots. Many gin gangs, also known as horse engine houses or wheelhouses, were lost in south–east England at this time. These were the buildings from which threshing machines were powered.[1]

The similar pattern of the disturbances, and their rapid spread across the country was often blamed[who?] on agitators, or upon "agents" sent from France, where the revolution of July 1830 had broken out a month before the Swing Riots began in Kent.

Lord Melbourne

The government, led by Home Secretary, Lord Melbourne, dealt with the riots harshly. Blaming local magistrates for being too lenient, the government appointed a Special Commission of three judges to try rioters in the counties of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Dorset, Wiltshire and Hampshire. Agreements made to raise wages or cut tithes were rarely honoured. Many arrests followed the riots. Across the country, nine of the rioters were hanged and a further 450 were sentenced to transportion to Australia.

In July 1831, the radical politician and writer William Cobbett was charged with seditious libel after writing a pamphlet entitled Rural War in support of the labourers involved in the Swing Riots. In trial, he Defended himself, and the jury did not convict him.

These riots added to the strong social, political and agricultural unrest throughout Britain in the 1830s. The 'Swing' riots were a big influence on the Whig Government,[citation needed] leading to the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834,[citation needed] ending "outdoor relief" in cash or kind, and setting up a chain of workhouses across the country, to which the poor had to go if they wanted help.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Hutton, Kenneth (1976). "The distribution of wheelhouses in Britain". Agricultural History Review (British Agricultural History Society) 24 (1): 30-35. http://www.bahs.org.uk/24n1a3.pdf. Retrieved 11 April 2010. 
  • Hobsbawm, Eric and George Rud (1973) Captain Swing: A Social History of the Great English Agricultural Uprising of 1830. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  • Bohstedt, John (1994) –The Dynamics of Riots: Escalation and Diffusion/Contagion.– In The Dynamics of Aggression, edited by Michael Potegal and John Knutson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[edit] External links

Related topics in the Connexions Subject Index

Alternatives  –  Left History  –  Libraries & Archives  –  Social Change  – 

This article is based on one or more articles in Wikipedia, with modifications and additional content contributed by Connexions editors. This article, and any information from Wikipedia, is covered by a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).

We welcome your help in improving and expanding the content of Connexipedia articles, and in correcting errors. Connexipedia is not a wiki: please contact Connexions by email if you wish to contribute. We are also looking for contributors interested in writing articles on topics, persons, events and organizations related to social justice and the history of social change movements.

For more information contact Connexions