Part of a series on Science

Natural sciences Astronomy Astrophysics– Cosmology Galactic astronomy– Planetary geology Planetary science– Stellar astronomy Biology Anatomy– Astrobiology– Biochemistry Biological engineering– Biophysics Behavioral neuroscience– Biotechnology Botany– Cell biology– Cryobiology Developmental biology Ecology– Ethnobiology Evolutionary biology (introduction) Genetics (introduction) Gerontology– Immunology– Limnology Marine biology– Microbiology Molecular biology– Neuroscience Paleontology– Parasitology– Physiology Radiobiology– Soil biology Theoretical biology– Toxicology– Zoology Chemistry Acid-base reaction theories– Alchemy Analytical chemistry– Astrochemistry Biochemistry– Crystallography Environmental chemistry– Food science Geochemistry– Green chemistry Inorganic chemistry– Materials science Molecular physics– Nuclear chemistry Organic chemistry– Photochemistry Physical chemistry– Radiochemistry Solid-state chemistry– Stereochemistry Supramolecular chemistry Surface science– Theoretical chemistry Earth sciences Atmospheric sciences– Ecology Environmental science– Geodesy Geology– Geomorphology Geophysics– Glaciology– Hydrology Limnology– Mineralogy– Oceanography Paleoclimatology– Palynology Physical geography– Soil science Space science Physics Applied physics– Atomic physics Computational physics Condensed matter physics Experimental physics– Mechanics Particle physics– Plasma physics Quantum mechanics (introduction) Solid mechanics– Theoretical physics Thermodynamics– Entropy General relativity– M-theory Special relativity

Social and behavioral sciences Anthropology– Archaeology Criminology– Demography Economics– Geography History– Linguistics Political science– Psychology Sociology

Applied sciences Engineering Agricultural– Biomedical– Chemical– Civil Computer– Electrical– Fire protection Genetic– Industrial– Mechanical– Military Mining– Nuclear– Software Health sciences Biological engineering– Dentistry Epidemiology– Health care– Medicine Nursing– Pharmacy– Social work Veterinary medicine

Formal sciences Computer science Logic Mathematics Statistics

Related topics Humanities Interdisciplinarity Applied physics– Artificial intelligence Bioethics– Bioinformatics– Biogeography Biomedical engineering– Biostatistics Cognitive science– Computational linguistics Cultural studies– Cybernetics Environmental studies– Ethnic studies Evolutionary psychology– Forestry Health– Library science– Logic Mathematical biology– Mathematical physics Scientific modelling– Neural engineering Neuroscience– Political economy Science and technology studies Science studies– Semiotics– Sociobiology Systems theory– Transdisciplinarity Urban planning History of science Philosophy of science Scientific method Fringe science Pseudoscience

v – d – e

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism (also spelled scepticism), sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a practical, epistemological position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence. In practice, the term is most commonly applied to the examination of claims and theories which appear to be beyond mainstream science, rather than to the routine discussions and challenges among scientists. Scientific skepticism is different from philosophical skepticism, which questions our ability to claim any knowledge about the nature of the world and how we perceive it. Scientific skepticism uses critical thinking and inductive reasoning while attempting to oppose claims made which lack suitable evidential basis. The New Skepticism described by Paul Kurtz is scientific skepticism^[1] and scientific skepticism is a core part of the Brights Movement beliefs.^[2]

The term "scientific skepticism" appears to have originated in the work of Carl Sagan, first in Contact (p. 306), and then in Billions and Billions (p. 135).^[3][4]

[edit] Characteristics

Scientific skeptics attempt to evaluate claims based on verifiability and falsifiability and discourage accepting claims on faith or anecdotal evidence. Skeptics often focus their criticism on claims they consider to be implausible, dubious or clearly contradictory to generally accepted science. This distinguishes scientific skeptics from professional scientists who often^{[weasel words]} concentrate on verifying or falsifying hypotheses created by those within their particular field.^{[citation needed]} Scientific skeptics do not assert that unusual claims should be automatically rejected out of hand on a priori grounds - rather they argue that claims of paranormal or anomalous phenomena should be critically examined and that such claims would require extraordinary evidence in their favor before they could be accepted as having validity.

Popular targets of criticism among skeptics include psychics, parapsychology, dowsing, astrology, creationism, homeopathy, tarot reading, alien abductions, and ESP, which are either pseudosciences or unsupported by existing evidence.^[5] Skeptics such as James Randi have become famous for debunking claims related to some of these. Many skeptics are atheists or agnostics, and have a naturalistic world-view, however some committed skeptics of pseudoscience including Martin Gardner have expressed belief in a god.^[6]

From a scientific point of view, theories are judged on many criteria, such as falsifiability, Occam's Razor, and explanatory power, as well as the degree to which their predictions match experimental results. Skepticism is part of the scientific method; for instance an experimental result is not regarded as established until it can be shown to be repeatable independently.^[7]

By the principles of skepticism, the ideal case is that every individual could make his own mind up on the basis of the evidence rather than appealing to some authority, skeptical or otherwise.

[edit] Perceived dangers of pseudoscience

Skepticism is an approach to strange or unusual claims where doubt is preferred to belief, given a lack of conclusive evidence. Skeptics generally consider beliefs in the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) and psychic powers as misguided, since no empirical evidence exists supporting such phenomena. The Ancient Greek philosopher Plato believed that to release another person from ignorance despite their initial resistance is a great and noble thing.^[8] Modern skeptical writers address this question in a variety of ways.

Bertrand Russell argued that individual actions are based upon the beliefs of the person acting, and if the beliefs are unsupported by evidence, then such beliefs can lead to destructive actions.^[9] James Randi also often writes on the issue of fraud by psychics and faith healers.^[10] Critics of alternative medicine often point to bad advice given by unqualified practitioners, leading to serious injury or death. Richard Dawkins points to religion as a source of violence (eg in his book The God Delusion, and considers creationism a threat to biology.^[11] Some skeptics, such as the members of The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe podcast, oppose certain cults and new religious movements because of their concern about what they consider false miracles performed or endorsed by the leadership of the group.^[12] They often criticize belief systems which they believe to be idiosyncratic, bizarre or irrational.

[edit] Notable skeptical media

Magazines

• Skeptic magazine (U.S.)
• Skeptical Inquirer magazine
• The Skeptic magazine (UK)
• Free Inquiry magazine
• The UK-Skeptics Newsletter^[13]

Television programs

• Penn & Teller: Bullshit!
• MythBusters

Podcasts

• The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe
• Skepticality
• The Skeptic Zone
• Skeptoid
• Point of Inquiry
• For Good Reason

[edit] See also

• Academic skepticism
• Australian Skeptics
• Philosophic burden of proof
• Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (formerly CSICOP)
• Critical rationalism
• Empiricism
• Freethought
• Philosophical skepticism
• Skepticism

[edit] References

[edit] Further reading

• Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-27242-6. 

• Randi, James (June 1982). Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions. Prometheus Books. pp. 342. ISBN 0345409469. 

• Randi, James; Arthur C. Clarke (1997). An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural. St. Martin's Griffin. pp. 336. ISBN 0312151195. 

• Sagan, Carl; Ann Druyan (1997). The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. Ballantine Books. pp. 349. ISBN 0345409469. 

• Gardner, Martin (1957). Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Dover Publications. pp. 373. ISBN 0486203948. 

[edit] External links

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Scientific skepticism

• Skeptic Links - A list of links of interest to Scientific Skeptics
• The Skeptic's Dictionary - Carroll, Robert Todd, contains many articles on science, alternative medicine, pseudoscience, etc
• A skeptical manifesto, Shermer, Michael, A philosophical analysis of scientific skepticism
• Proper Criticism. (csicop.org) - Hyman, Ray, Suggestions to upgrade the quality of Scientific skepticism
• Strategies for dissenting scientists. Martin, Brian, Society for Scientific Exploration. Journal of Scientific Exploration, Volume 12 No 4. 1998. (PDF), Strategies available for dissenting scientists.
• Rational Skepticism Forum - A community dedicated to the very essence of rational skepticism.
• Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit. Operation Clambake. 1998. Based on the book "The Demon Haunted World: Science as a candle in the dark". (ISBN 0-345-40946-9)
• New England Skeptical Society Newsletter Articles - Includes articles on such topics as Homeopathy, Intelligent Design, and other pseudoscientific topics
• sci.skeptic FAQ
• UK-Skeptics - the UK's rational skeptics organisation.
• Nonsense (And Why It's So Popular) A course syllabus from The College of Wooster.