Prague Spring

History of Czechoslovakia
Coat of Arms of Czechoslovakia
This article is part of a series

First Republic

Second Republic and World War II

Third Republic

Communist Era

Velvet Revolution and Democracy


(January 1, 1993)

   v– d– e 

The Prague Spring (Czech: PraÅsk jaro, Slovak: PraÅsk¡ jar) was a period of political liberalization in Czechoslovakia during the era of its domination by the Soviet Union after World War II. It began on 5 January 1968, when reformist Slovak Alexander Dubäek came to power, and continued until 21 August when the Soviet Union and members of its Warsaw Pact allies invaded the country to halt the reforms.

The Prague Spring reforms were an attempt by Dubäek to grant additional rights to the citizens in an act of partial decentralization of the economy and democratization. The freedoms granted included a loosening of restrictions on the media, speech and travel. After national discussion of separating the country into a federation of three republics, Bohemia, Moravia and Slovakia, Dubäek oversaw the decision for two, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.[1] This was the only change that survived the end of the Prague Spring.

The reforms, especially the decentralisation of administrative authority, were not received well by the Soviets who, after failed negotiations, sent thousands of Warsaw Pact troops and tanks to occupy the country. A large wave of emigration swept the nation. While there were many non-violent protests in the country, including the protest-suicide of a student, there was no military resistance. Czechoslovakia remained occupied until 1990.

After the invasion, Czechoslovakia entered a period of normalization: subsequent leaders attempted to restore the political and economic values that had prevailed before Dubäek gained control of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (KSä). Gust¡v Hus¡k, who replaced Dubäek and also became president, reversed almost all of Dubäek's reforms. The Prague Spring inspired music and literature such as the work of V¡clav Havel, Karel Husa, Karel Kryl, and Milan Kundera's novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being.


[edit] Background

The process of de-Stalinization in Czechoslovakia had begun under Antonn Novotn in the late 1950s and early 1960s, but had progressed slower than in most other socialist states of the Eastern Bloc.[2] Following the lead of Nikita Khrushchev, Novotn proclaimed the completion of socialism, and the new constitution,[3] accordingly, adopted the name Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. The pace of change, however, was sluggish; the rehabilitation of Stalinist-era victims, such as those convicted in the Sl¡nsk trials, may have been considered as early as 1963, but did not take place until 1967.[4] As the strict regime eased its rules, the Union of Czechoslovak Writers cautiously began to air discontent, and in the union's gazette, Liter¡rn noviny, members suggested that literature should be independent of Party doctrine.[5]

In the early 1960s, Czechoslovakia underwent an economic downturn.[6] The Soviet model of industrialization applied poorly to Czechoslovakia. Czechoslovakia was already quite industrialized before World War II and the Soviet model mainly took into account less developed economies. Novotn's attempt at restructuring the economy, the 1965 New Economic Model, spurred increased demand for political reform as well.[7]

In June 1967, a small fraction of the Czech writer's union sympathized with radical socialists, specifically Ludvk Vaculk, Milan Kundera, Jan Proch¡zka, Antonn Jaroslav Liehm, Pavel Kohout and Ivan Klma.[5] A few months later, at a party meeting, it was decided that administrative actions against the writers who openly expressed support of reformation would be taken. Since only a small part of the union held these beliefs, the remaining members were relied upon to discipline their colleagues.[5] Control over Liter¡rn noviny and several other publishing houses was transferred to the ministry of culture,[5] and even members of the party who later became major reformers–including Dubäek–endorsed these moves.[5]

Meanwhile, president Antonn Novotn was losing support. First Secretary of the regional Communist Party of Slovakia, Alexander Dubäek, and economist Ota Åik challenged him at a meeting of the Central Committee. Novotn then invited Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev to Prague that December, seeking support;[8] but Brezhnev was surprised at the extent of the opposition to Novotn and thus supported his removal as Czechoslovakia's leader. Dubäek replaced Novotn as First Secretary on 5 January 1968.[9] On 22 March 1968, Novotn resigned his presidency and was replaced by Ludvk Svoboda, who later gave consent to the reforms.[10]

[edit] Liberalization and reform

Early signs of change were few. When the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (KSä) Presidium member Josef Smrkovsk was interviewed in a Rud Pr¡vo article, entitled "What Lies Ahead", he insisted that Dubäek's appointment at the January Plenum would further the goals of socialism and maintain the working-class nature of the Communist Party.[11]

On the 20th anniversary of Czechoslovakia–s "Victorious February", Dubäek delivered a speech explaining the need for change following the triumph of socialism. He emphasized the need to "enforce the leading role of the party more effectively"[12] and acknowledged that, despite Klement Gottwald's urgings for better relations with society, the Party had too often made heavy-handed rulings on trivial issues. Dubäek declared the party's mission was "to build an advanced socialist society on sound economic foundations ... a socialism that corresponds to the historical democratic traditions of Czechoslovakia, in accordance with the experience of other communist parties ..."[12]

In April, Dubäek launched an "Action Program" of liberalizations, which included increasing freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and freedom of movement, with economic emphasis on consumer goods and the possibility of a multiparty government. The program was based on the view that "Socialism cannot mean only liberation of the working people from the domination of exploiting class relations, but must make more provisions for a fuller life of the personality than any bourgeois democracy."[13] The program would limit the power of the secret police[14] and provide for the federalization of the äSSR into two equal nations.[15] The Program also covered foreign policy, including both the maintenance of good relations with Western countries and cooperation with the Soviet Union and other communist nations.[16] It spoke of a ten year transition through which democratic elections would be made possible and a new form of democratic socialism would replace the status quo.[17]

Those who drafted the Program, however, were careful not to criticize the actions of the post-war communist regime, only to point out policies that they felt had outlived their usefulness.[18] For instance, the immediate post-war situation had required "centralist and directive-administrative methods"[18] to fight against the "remnants of the bourgeoisie."[18] Since the "antagonistic classes"[18] were said to have been defeated with the achievement of socialism, these methods were no longer necessary. Reform was needed, stated the Program, for the Czechoslovak economy to join the "scientific-technical revolution in the world"[18] rather than relying on Stalinist-era heavy industry, labor power, and raw materials.[18] Furthermore, since internal class conflict had been overcome, workers could now be duly rewarded for their qualifications and technical skills without contravening Marxist-Leninism. The Program suggested it was now necessary to ensure important positions were "filled by capable, educated socialist expert cadres" in order to compete with capitalism.[18]

Although the Action Program stipulated that reform must proceed under KSä direction, popular pressure mounted to implement reforms immediately.[19] Radical elements became more vocal: anti-Soviet polemics appeared in the press (after the formal abolishment of censorship on 26 June 1968),[17] the Social Democrats began to form a separate party, and new unaffiliated political clubs were created. Party conservatives urged repressive measures, but Dubäek counseled moderation and reemphasized KSä leadership.[20] At the Presidium of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia in April, Dubäek announced a political program of "socialism with a human face".[21] In May, he announced that the Fourteenth Party Congress would convene in an early session on 9 September. The congress would incorporate the Action Program into the party statutes, draft a federalization law, and elect a new Central Committee.[22]

Dubäek's reforms guaranteed freedom of the press, and political commentary was allowed for the first time in mainstream media.[23] At the time of the Prague Spring, Czechoslovak exports were declining in competitiveness, and Dubäek's reforms planned to solve these troubles by mixing planned and market economies. Within the party, there were varying opinions on how this should proceed; certain economists wished for a more mixed economy while others wanted the economy to remain mostly socialist. Dubäek continued to stress the importance of economic reform proceeding under Communist Party rule.[24]

On 27 June Ludvk Vaculk, a leading author and journalist, published a manifesto titled The Two Thousand Words. It expressed concern about conservative elements within the KSä and so-called "foreign" forces. Vaculk called on the people to take the initiative in implementing the reform program.[25] Dubäek, the party Presidium, the National Front, and the cabinet denounced this manifesto.[26]

[edit] Soviet reaction

Leonid Brezhnev

Initial reaction within the Communist Bloc was mixed. Hungary's J¡nos K¡d¡r was highly supportive of Dubäek's appointment in January, but Leonid Brezhnev and others grew concerned about Dubäek's reforms, which they feared might weaken the position of the Communist Bloc during the Cold War.[27][28][29]

At a 23 March meeting in Dresden, leaders of "Warsaw Five" (USSR, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria and East Germany) questioned a Czechoslovak delegation over the planned reforms, suggesting any talk of "democratization" was a veiled critique of other policies.[30] WÅadysÅaw GomuÅka and Janos K¡d¡r were less concerned with the reforms themselves than with the growing criticisms leveled by the Czechoslovak media, and worried the situation might be "similar to the prologue of the Hungarian counterrevolution".[30] Some of the language in April's KSä Action Program may have been chosen to assert that no counterrevolution was planned, but Kieran Williams suggests that Dubäek was perhaps surprised at, but not resentful of, Soviet suggestions.[31]

The Soviet leadership tried to stop or limit the changes in the äSSR through a series of negotiations. The Soviet Union agreed to bilateral talks with Czechoslovakia in July at äierna nad Tisou, near the Slovak-Soviet border. At the meeting, Dubäek defended the program of the reformist wing of the KSä while pledging commitment to the Warsaw Pact and Comecon.[16] The KSä leadership, however, was divided between vigorous reformers (Josef Smrkovsk, OldÅich äernk, and FrantiÅ¡ek Kriegel) who supported Dubäek, and conservatives (Vasil Biäak, Drahomr Kolder, and OldÅich Åvestka) who adopted an anti-reformist stance. Brezhnev decided on compromise. The KSä delegates reaffirmed their loyalty to the Warsaw Pact and promised to curb "anti-socialist" tendencies, prevent the revival of the Czechoslovak Social Democratic Party, and control the press more effectively. The Soviets agreed to withdraw their troops (still in Czechoslovakia after maneuvers back in June) and permit the 9 September party congress.[32]

On 3 August representatives from the Soviet Union, East Germany, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Czechoslovakia met in Bratislava and signed the Bratislava Declaration. The declaration affirmed unshakable fidelity to Marxism-Leninism and proletarian internationalism and declared an implacable struggle against "bourgeois" ideology and all "anti-socialist" forces.[33] The Soviet Union expressed its intention to intervene in a Warsaw Pact country if a "bourgeois" system–a pluralist system of several political parties representing different factions of the capitalist class–was ever established. After the Bratislava conference, Soviet troops left Czechoslovak territory but remained along its borders.[34]

[edit] Invasion

As these talks proved unsatisfactory, the Soviets began to consider a military alternative. The Soviet Union's policy of compelling the socialist governments of its satellite states to subordinate their national interests to those of the "Eastern Bloc" (through military force if needed) became known as the Brezhnev Doctrine.[35] On the night of 20-21 August 1968, Eastern Bloc armies from four Warsaw Pact countries – the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Poland and Hungary–invaded the äSSR.[36][37]

That night, 200,000 Warsaw Pact troops and 2,000 tanks entered the country.[38] The troops first occupied the Ruzynä International Airport, where air deployment of more troops was arranged. The Czechoslovak forces were confined to their own barracks and were surrounded until the threat of a counter-attack was assuaged. By the morning of 21 August Czechoslovakia was occupied.[37]

Neither Romania nor Albania took part in the invasion, the latter having withdrawn from the Warsaw Pact in 1962.[39] During the attack of the Warsaw Pact armies, 72 Czechs and Slovaks were killed (19 of those in Slovakia), 266 severely wounded and another 436 were lightly injured.[40][41] Alexander Dubäek called upon his people not to resist.[41] Nevertheless, there was scattered resistance in the streets. Road signs in towns were removed or painted over–except for those indicating the way to Moscow.[42] Many small villages renamed themselves "Dubcek" or "Svoboda"; without navigational equipment, the invaders were often confused.[43]

Although on the night of the invasion the Czechoslovak Presidium declared that Warsaw Pact troops had crossed the border without the knowledge of the äSSR government, the Soviet Press printed an unsigned request, allegedly by Czechoslovak party and state leaders, for "immediate assistance, including assistance with armed forces".[44] At the 14th KSä Party Congress (conducted secretly, immediately following the intervention), it was emphasized that no member of the leadership had invited the intervention.[45] More recent evidence suggests that certain conservative KSä members (including Biäak, Åvestka, Kolder, Indra, and Kapek) did send a request for intervention to the Soviets.[46] The invasion was followed by a wave of emigration, unseen before, which stopped shortly after. An estimated 70,000 fled immediately, and the total eventually reached 300,000.[47]

The Soviets attributed the invasion to the "Brezhnev Doctrine" which stated that the U.S.S.R. had the right to intervene whenever a country in the Eastern Bloc appeared to be making a shift towards capitalism.[48] There is still some uncertainty, however, as to what provocation, if any, occurred to make the Warsaw Pact armies invade. The days leading up to the invasion was a rather calm period without any major events taking place in Czechoslovakia.[22]

[edit] Reactions to the invasion

Romanian president Nicolae CeauÅescu gives a speech critical of the invasion, in front of a crowd in Bucharest, 21 August 1968

In Czechoslovakia, popular opposition to the invasion was expressed in numerous spontaneous acts of nonviolent resistance. On 19 January 1969, student Jan Palach set himself on fire in Prague's Wenceslas Square to protest against the renewed suppression of free speech.[49] The generalized resistance caused the Soviet Union to abandon its original plan to oust the First Secretary. Dubäek, who had been arrested on the night of 20 August was taken to Moscow for negotiations. There, he and several other leaders signed, under heavy psychological pressure from Soviet politicians, the Moscow Protocol and it was agreed that Dubäek would remain in office and a program of moderate reform would continue.

Protest banner in Russian reading "For your freedom and ours"

On 25 August citizens of the Soviet Union who did not approve of the invasion protested in Red Square; eight protesters opened banners with anti-invasion slogans. The demonstrators were arrested and later punished; the protest was dubbed "anti-Soviet".[50]

A more pronounced effect took place in Communist Romania, where leader Nicolae CeauÅescu, already a staunch opponent of Soviet influences and a self-declared Dubäek supporter, gave a public speech in Bucharest on the day of the invasion, depicting Soviet policies in harsh terms.[39] In Finland, a country under some Soviet political influence, the occupation caused a major scandal.[51]

Like the Italian and French[52] Communist Parties, the Communist Party of Finland denounced the occupation. Nonetheless, Finnish president Urho Kekkonen was the very first Western politician to officially visit Czechoslovakia after August 1968; he received the highest Czechoslovakian honors from the hands of president Ludvk Svoboda, on October 4, 1969.[51] The Portuguese communist secretary-general lvaro Cunhal was one of few political leaders from western Europe to have supported the invasion for being counterrevolutionary.[53] along with the Luxembourg party[52] and conservative factions of the Greek party.[52]

Helsinki demonstration against the invasion of Czechoslovakia

Western countries offered only vocal criticism following the invasion. The night of the invasion, Canada, Denmark, France, Paraguay, the United Kingdom and the United States requested a meeting of the United Nations Security Council.[54] At the meeting, the Czechoslovak ambassador Jan Muzik denounced the invasion. Soviet ambassador Jacob Malik insisted the Warsaw Pact actions were "fraternal assistance" against "antisocial forces".[54]

The next day, several countries suggested a resolution condemning the intervention and calling for immediate withdrawal. Eventually, a vote was taken. Ten members supported the motion; Algeria, India, and Pakistan abstained; the USSR (with veto power) and Hungary opposed it. Canadian delegates immediately introduced another motion asking for a UN representative to travel to Prague and work toward the release of the imprisoned Czechoslovak leaders.[54]

By 26 August another vote had not taken place, but a new Czechoslovak representative requested the whole issue be removed from the Security Council's agenda. Shirley Temple Black visited Prague in August 1968 to help set up a Czechoslovak branch of the International Multiple Sclerosis Society and she was part of a U.S. Embassy-organized convoy of vehicles that evacuated Americans from the country after the August 21 invasion. In August 1989, she returned to Prague as U.S. Ambassador, three months before the Velvet Revolution that ended 41 years of Communist rule.[55]

[edit] Aftermath

Memorial to the victims of the invasion, located in Liberec

In April 1969, Dubäek was replaced as first secretary by Gust¡v Hus¡k, and a period of "normalization" began.[56] Dubäek was expelled from the KSä and given a job as a forestry official.[15][57]

Hus¡k reversed Dubäek's reforms, purged the party of its liberal members, and dismissed from public office professional and intellectual elites who openly expressed disagreement with the political transformation.[58] Hus¡k worked to reinstate the power of the police authorities and strengthen ties with other socialist nations. He also sought to re-centralize the economy, as a considerable amount of freedom had been granted to industries during the Prague Spring.[58] Commentary on politics was disallowed again in mainstream media and political statements by anyone who was not considered to have "full political trust" were also banned.[23] The only significant change that survived was the federalization of the country, which created the Czech Socialist Republic and the Slovak Socialist Republic in 1969.

In 1987, the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev acknowledged that his liberalizing policies of glasnost and perestroika owed a great deal to Dubäek's "socialism with a human face".[59] With the fall of socialism in 1989, Dubäek became chairman of the federal assembly under the Havel administration.[60] When asked what the difference was between the Prague Spring and Gorbachev's own reforms, a Foreign Ministry spokesman replied, "Nineteen years."[61]

After Communism fell in Czechoslovakia in the Velvet Revolution of 1989, Dubäek was elected the Speaker of the Federal Assembly, a position he held until June 1992. He eventually would lead the Social Democratic Party of Slovakia, and spoke against the dissolution of Czechoslovakia prior to his death in November 1992.[62]

[edit] Cultural impact

The Prague Spring deepened the disillusionment of many Western leftists with Marxist-Leninist views. It contributed to the growth of Eurocommunist ideas in Western communist parties, which sought greater distance from the Soviet Union, and eventually led to the dissolution of many of these groups.[63] A decade later, a period of Chinese political liberalization became known as the Beijing Spring. It also partly influenced the Croatian Spring in Yugoslavia.[64] In a 1993 Czech survey, 60% of those surveyed had a personal memory linked to the Prague Spring while another 30% were familiar with the events in some other form.[65]

The event has been referenced in popular music, including the music of Karel Kryl, LuboÅ¡ FiÅ¡er's Requiem,[66] and Karel Husa's Music for Prague 1968.[67] The Israeli song "Prague", written by Shalom Hanoch and performed by Arik Einstein at the Israel Song Festival of 1969, was a lamentation on the fate of the city after the Soviet invasion and mentions Jan Palach's Self-immolation. [68] "They Can't Stop The Spring", a song by Irish journalist and songwriter John Waters, represented Ireland in the Eurovision Song Contest in 2007. Waters has described it as "a kind of Celtic celebration of the Eastern European revolutions and their eventual outcome", quoting Dubäek's alleged comment: "They may crush the flowers, but they can't stop the Spring."[69]

The Prague Spring has also appeared in literature. Milan Kundera set his novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being during the Prague Spring. It follows the repercussions of increased Soviet presence and the dictatorial police control of the population.[70] A film version was released in 1988.[71] The Liberators, by Viktor Suvorov, is an eyewitness description of the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia, from the point of view of a Soviet tank commander.[72] Rock 'n' Roll, a play by award-winning playwright Tom Stoppard, references the Prague Spring, as well as the 1989 Velvet Revolution.[73] Heda Margolius Kov¡ly also ends her memoir Under a Cruel Star with a first hand account of the Prague Spring and the subsequent invasion, and her reflections upon these events.[74]

Other than the film adaptation of The Unbearable Lightness of Being, there is also the movie PelÅ¡ky from director Jan HÅebejk and screenwriter Petr Jarchovsk, which depicts the events of the Prague Spring and ends with the invasion by the Soviet Union and their allies.[75] The Czech musical film, Rebelov from Filip Renä, also depicts the events, the invasion and subsequent emigration wave.[75]

The number 68 has become iconic in the former Czechoslovakia. Hockey player Jaromr J¡gr wears the number because of the importance of the year in Czechoslovak history.[76][77] A former publishing house based in Toronto, 68 Publishers, that published books by exiled Czech and Slovak authors, took its name from the event.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Czech radio broadcasts 18-20 August 1968
  2. ^ Williams (1997), p 170
  3. ^ Williams (1997), p 7
  4. ^ Skilling (1976), p 47
  5. ^ a b c d e Williams (1997), p 55
  6. ^ ", (info from CIA world Factbook)". Photius Coutsoukis. Retrieved 2008-01-20. 
  7. ^ Williams (1997), p 5
  8. ^ Navr¡til (2006), pp 18–20
  9. ^ Navazelskis (1990)
  10. ^ "Antonin Novotn Biography". Libri publishing house. Retrieved 2007-01-20. 
  11. ^ Navr¡til (2006), p 46
  12. ^ a b Navr¡til (2006), pp 52–54
  13. ^ Ello (1968), pp 32, 54
  14. ^ Von Geldern, James; Siegelbaum, Lewis. "The Soviet-led Intervention in Czechoslovakia". Retrieved 2008-03-07. 
  15. ^ a b Hochman, Dubäek (1993)
  16. ^ a b Dubäek, Alexander; Kramer, Mark; Moss, Joy; Tosek, Ruth (translation) (1968-04-10). "Akän program Komunistick strany äeskoslovenska" (in Czech). Action Program (Rud pr¡vo): pp. 1–6. Retrieved 2008-02-21. 
  17. ^ a b Judt (2005), p 441
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Ello (1968), pp 7–8, 129–30, 9, 131
  19. ^ Derasadurain, Beatrice. "Prague Spring". Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  20. ^ Kusin (2002), p 107–122
  21. ^ "The Prague Spring, 1968". Library of Congress. 1985.,-1968.html. Retrieved 2008-01-05. 
  22. ^ a b Williams (1997), p 156
  23. ^ a b Williams (1997), p 164
  24. ^ Williams (1997), pp 18–22
  25. ^ Vaculk, Ludvk (1968-06-27). "Two Thousand Words". Liter¡rn listy. 
  26. ^ Mastalir, Linda (2006-07-25). "Ludvk Vaculk: a Czechoslovak man of letters". Radio Prague. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  27. ^ Navr¡til (2006), p 37
  28. ^ "Document #81: Transcript of Leonid Brezhnev's Telephone Conversation with Alexander Dubäek, August 13, 1968". The Prague Spring '68. The Prague Spring Foundation. 1998. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  29. ^ Navr¡til (2006), pp 172–181
  30. ^ a b Navr¡til (2006), pp 64–72
  31. ^ Williams (1997), pp 10–11
  32. ^ Navr¡til (2006), pp 448–479
  33. ^ Navr¡til (2006), pp 326–329
  34. ^ Navr¡til (2006), pp 326–327
  35. ^ Chafetz (1993), p 10
  36. ^ Ouimet (2003), pp 34–35
  37. ^ a b "Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia". Military. 2005-04-27. Retrieved 2007-01-19. 
  38. ^ Washington Post, (Final Edition), 21 August 1968, p A11
  39. ^ a b Curtis, Glenn E.. "The Warsaw Pact". Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. Retrieved 2008-02-19. 
  40. ^ "Springtime for Prague". Prague Life. Lifeboat Limited. Retrieved 2006-04-30. 
  41. ^ a b Williams (1997), p 158
  42. ^ See Paul Chan, "Fearless Symmetry" Artforum International vol. 45, March 2007.
  43. ^ "Civilian Resistance in Czechoslovakia". Fragments. Retrieved 2009-01-05. 
  44. ^ Skilling (1976)
  45. ^ Navr¡til (2006), p xviii
  46. ^ Fowkes (2000), pp 64–85
  47. ^ äulk, Jan. "Den, kdy tanky zlikvidovaly äesk sny PraÅskho jara". Britsk Listy. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  48. ^ Grenville (2005), p 780
  49. ^ "Jan Palach". Radio Prague. Retrieved 2008-02-19. 
  50. ^ Gorbanevskaya (1972)
  51. ^ a b Jutikkala, Pirinen (2001)
  52. ^ a b c Devlin, Kevin. "Western CPs Condemn Invasion, Hail Prague Spring". Open Society Archives. Retrieved 2008-02-20. 
  53. ^ Andrew, Mitrokhin (2005), p 444
  54. ^ a b c Franck (1985)
  55. ^ Joseph, Lawrence E (1990-12-02). "International; Prague's Spring Into Capitalism". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-02-20. 
  56. ^ Williams (1997), p xi
  57. ^ "Alexander Dubcek". Spartacus Educational. Retrieved 2008-01-25. 
  58. ^ a b Goertz (1995), pp 154–157
  59. ^ Gorbachev (2003), p x
  60. ^ Cook (2001), pp 320–321
  61. ^ Kaufman, Michael T (1987-04-12). "Gorbachev Alludes to Czech Invasion". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-04. 
  62. ^ Alexander Dubcek, 70, Dies in Prague (New York Times, 8 November 1992)
  63. ^ Aspaturian (1980), p 174
  64. ^ Despalatoviä (2000), pp 91–92
  65. ^ Williams (1997), p 29
  66. ^ "LuboÅ¡ FiÅ¡er". CZMIC. 2005-02-05. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  67. ^ Duffie, Bruce (2001-12-01). "Karel Husa, The Composer in Conversation with Bruce Duffie". New Music Connoisseur Magazine. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  68. ^ Biography of Arik Einstein - The Solo Years, Mooma (in Hebrew), accessed May 15 2010.
  69. ^ "John Waters, The Events That Transpired it". Spring: The Events that Transpired it. 2007-02-11. Retrieved 2008-01-21. 
  70. ^ Kundera (1999), p 1
  71. ^ "The Unbearable Lightness of Being". Retrieved 2008-03-29. 
  72. ^ Suvorov (1983), p 1
  73. ^ Mastalir, Linda (2006-06-28). "Tom Stoppard's "Rock 'n' Roll"". Radio Prague. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 
  74. ^ Margolius-Kov¡ly (1986), pp 178–192
  75. ^ a b äulk, Jan (2008-04-11). "The Prague Spring as reflected in Czech postcommunist cinema". Britsk Listy. Retrieved 2008-04-16. 
  76. ^ Morrison (2006), pp 158–159
  77. ^ "Legends of Hockey, Jaromr J¡gr". Hockey Hall of Fame and Museum. Retrieved 2008-01-23. 

[edit] External links

Related topics in the Connexions Subject Index

Alternatives  –  Left History  –  Libraries & Archives  –  Social Change  – 

This article is based on one or more articles in Wikipedia, with modifications and additional content contributed by Connexions editors. This article, and any information from Wikipedia, is covered by a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).

We welcome your help in improving and expanding the content of Connexipedia articles, and in correcting errors. Connexipedia is not a wiki: please contact Connexions by email if you wish to contribute. We are also looking for contributors interested in writing articles on topics, persons, events and organizations related to social justice and the history of social change movements.

For more information contact Connexions