In the anarchist, communist and socialist sense, free association (also called free association of producers or, as Marx often called, community of freely associated individuals) is a kind of relation between individuals where there is no state, social class or authority in a society that had abolished the private property of means of production. Once private property is abolished, individuals are no longer deprived of access to means of production so they can freely associate themselves (without social constraint) to produce and reproduce their own conditions of existence and fulfill their needs and desires.

The concept of free association, however, becomes more clear around the concept of the proletariat. The proletarian is someone who has no property of any means of production and, therefore, to survive, sells the only thing that he has, his abilities (the labour power), to those who holds the ownership of the means of production. The existence of individuals deprived of property, deprived of livelihood, allows owners (or capitalists) to find in the market an object of consumption that thinks and acts (human abilities), which they use in order to accumulate increasingly capital in exchange for the wage that maintains the survival of the proletarians. The relationship between proletarians and owners of the means of production is thereby a forced association in which the proletarian is only free to sell its labor power, in order to survive. By selling its productive capacity in exchange for the wage which ensures the survival, the proletarian puts his practical activity under the will of the buyer (the owner), becoming alienated from his/her own actions and products, in a relationship of domination and exploitation. Free association would be the form of society created if private property was abolished in order to individuals freely dispose of the means of production, which would bring about an end to class society, i.e. there would be no more owners neither proletarians, nor state, but only freely associated individuals.

The abolition of private property by a free association of producers is the original goal of the communists and anarchists: it is identified with anarchy and Communism itself. However, the evolution of various trends have led some to virtually abandon the goal or to put it in the background in face of other tasks, while others trends consider free association as something that should guide the all practical activity of the contestation of the status quo.

[edit] Anarchists

Part of the Politics series on
Anarchism
Schools of thought Buddhist– Capitalist Christian– Collectivist Communist– Egoist– Feminist Green– Individualist– Infoanarchism Insurrectionary– Leftist– Mutualist Nihilist– Pacifist– Philosophical Platformist– Post-anarchist– Post-colonial– Post-left– Primitivist– Social– Syndicalist– Synthesist– Vegan Voluntaryist– Without adjectives– Zen
Theory– practice Anarchy– Black bloc Class struggle – Communes Consensus democracy Decentralization– Deep ecology Direct action– Direct democracy Dual power– Especifismo Expropriative anarchism– Horizontalidad– Illegalism Individualism– Individual reclamation Isocracy– Law Participatory politics Permanent Autonomous Zone Polycentric law Prefigurative politics Propaganda of the deed Refusal of work– Rewilding Social ecology Social insertion– Spontaneous order
People William Godwin– Josiah Warren Max Stirner– Johann Most Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Mikhail Bakunin Henry David Thoreau– Leo Tolstoy Peter Kropotkin– Benjamin Tucker Errico Malatesta– Emma Goldman Nestor Makhno– Alexander Berkman Buenaventura Durruti mile Armand– Murray Rothbard Murray Bookchin– Colin Ward John Zerzan
Issues Anarcho-capitalism– Animal rights Capitalism– Criticisms– Islam LGBT rights Lifestylism– Marxism– Nationalism Orthodox Judaism– Religion Sex/love– Violence
History 1999 WTO Conference protest 1919 United States anarchist bombings Amakasu Incident Anarchist Catalonia Anarchist Exclusion Act Australian Anarchist Centenary Barcelona May Days Biennio rosso Carnival Against Capitalism Escuela Moderna– Hague Congress Haymarket affair High Treason Incident Congress of Amsterdam Kate Sharpley Library Kronstadt rebellion Labadie Collection– LIP Manifesto of the Sixteen May 1968 – May Day Paris Commune Provo– Red inverted triangle Free Territory of Ukraine Spanish Revolution Third Russian Revolution Tragic Week– Trial of the thirty
Culture Anarchist Bookfair– Anarcho-punk– Arts Black anarchism– Culture jamming DIY culture– Freeganism Independent Media Center Infoshop– The Internationale Jewish anarchism– Land and liberty Lifestylism– Popular education Property is theft! Radical cheerleading Radical environmentalism Squatting– Symbolism Terminology– A las barricadas
Economics Collectivism Communism– Co-operatives Counter-economics Free school– Free store Gift economy Infoanarchism Market abolitionism– Mutual aid Mutualism– Participatory economics Planned Economy Really Really Free Market – Syndicalism Wage slavery Workers' self-management
By region Africa– Australia– Austria-Hungary– Brazil Canada– China– Cuba– Ecuador– England France– Greece– India– Iceland– Ireland Israel– Italy– Japan– Korea Mexico– Poland– Russia– Spain Sweden– Turkey– Ukraine United States– Vietnam
Lists Anarcho-punk bands– Books Communities– Fictional characters Jewish anarchists– Musicians Organizations– Periodicals– Poets Russian anarchists
Related topics Anti-capitalism– Anti-consumerism– Anti-corporatism Anti-fascism– Anti-globalization– Antimilitarism Anti-statism– Anti-war– Autarchism Autonomism– Labour movement Left communism– Libertarianism Libertarian perspectives on revolution Libertarian socialism Situationist International
Anarchism Portal Politics portal
v – d – e

Anarchists argue that the free association must rise immediately in the struggle of the proletariat for a new society and against the ruling class. So they preach a social revolution that immediately abolish the state, private property and classes. They identify the state as the main guarantor of private property (through the repressive apparatus: the police, justice), hence the abolition of the state is their main target. There is a difference between collectivist anarchists and anarchist communists: the collectivist anarchists (Mikhail Bakunin, for example) argue that free association is to function as the maxim "to each according to his deeds". In contraposition the anarcho-communists (such as Peter Kropotkin, Carlo Cafiero and Errico Malatesta) argue that free association should operate as the maxim "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". Anarchist communists argue against the collectivists that remuneration according to work performed require that the individuals involved were subjected to a body above them to compare the various works in order to pay them, and that this body would necessarily be a state or ruling class, would bring back even wage slavery, that is the very thing against which anarchists are fighting. They also argue that if any work is done, it is necessary and important, there is no quantitative aspect to comparate between them, and that everything is produced involves as something essential the contribution of all past and contemporary generations as a whole. Therefore, there are not fair criterion to compare a work with another and measure it to give every one his share. For the anarcho-communists, therefore, free association is possible only through the abolition of money and the market, along with the abolition of the state.^[1][2]

[edit] Marxists

Part of a series on
Marxist theory
Theoretical works The Communist Manifesto A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy Das Kapital The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon Grundrisse The German Ideology Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 Theses on Feuerbach
Social sciences Alienation– Marx's theory of the state– Bourgeoisie Base and superstructure Class consciousness Commodity fetishism Communism– Socialism Exploitation– Human nature Ideology– Proletariat Reification– Cultural hegemony Relations of production
Economics Marxian economics Scientific socialism Economic determinism Labour power– Law of value Means of production Mode of production Productive forces Surplus labour– Surplus value Transformation problem Wage labour
History Marx's theory of history Historical materialism Historical determinism Anarchism and Marxism Capitalist production Class struggle Dictatorship of the proletariat Primitive capital accumulation Proletarian revolution Proletarian internationalism World revolution Stateless communism
Philosophy Marxist philosophy Dialectical materialism Historical materialism Philosophy in the Soviet Union Marxist philosophy of nature Marxist humanism Marxist feminism Western Marxism Analytical Marxism Libertarian Marxism Marxist autonomism Marxist geography Marxist literary criticism Structural Marxism Post-Marxism Young Marx
People Karl Marx – Friedrich Engels Karl Kautsky – Eduard Bernstein Georgi Plekhanov– Rosa Luxemburg Vladimir Lenin – Leon Trotsky Frankfurt School – Louis Althusser Georg Luk¡cs – Karl Korsch Antonio Gramsci – Antonie Pannekoek Guy Debord more
Criticism Criticisms of Marxism
Categories All categorised articles
Communism portal
v – d – e

The Marxian Socialists and Communists generally differ from anarchists in claiming that there must be an intermediate stage between the capitalist society and free association. But there are major differences between the various Marxists trends. The Marx position about this transition period ranged from "the expansion of the means of production owned by the state" ^[3] to the clear statement that the state machinery can not be assumed by the workers, but destroyed ^[4]. Therefore, Marx's writings gave rise to three basic trends: social democracy, Leninism and council communism. Social Democracy (e.g., Eduard Bernstein and Karl Kautsky) argues that the advent of free association will come gradually through reforms made by representatives elected in a democratic state. Leninists (such as Lenin and Trotsky) argue that it will come only after reforms that they themselves make after taking power through a coup, a political revolution. The content of these reforms, for both social democracy and Leninism, would be the transfer of private property into the hands of the state, which would keep the rest of society deprived of access to means of production, as in capitalism, but it would be used to fight the bourgeoisie and direct the society towards free association in the future. The Council Communists (e.g., Anton Pannekoek, Otto Rhle and Herman Gorter) claim that the state can not be directed towards the free association because it can only act within the frame of capitalist society itself, leading towards a state capitalism (i.e., capitalism in which privative property is owned by state) which would seek to remain indefinitely, and never lead to free association. The Council Communists claim that free association can only be achieved through the direct action of workers themselves, which should create workers' councils (which operate under direct democracy) to take the means of production and abolish the state in a social revolution.^[5][6]

[edit] Socialists

Part of a series on Socialism
Currents Marxist socialism Scientific socialism Democratic socialism Libertarian socialism– Mutualism Market socialism – State socialism Utopian socialism– Communism Social anarchism– Syndicalism Social democracy Revolutionary socialism Green socialism– Guild socialism 21st century socialism Agrarian socialism
Key topics and issues Types History Economics State Criticisms
Concepts Economic planning– Free association Equality of opportunity Direct democracy Adhocracy– Technocracy Self-management– Economic democracy Public ownership– Common ownership Social dividend– Basic income Production for use Calculation in kind– Labour voucher Industrial democracy
People Charles Hall– Henri de Saint-Simon Robert Owen– Charles Fourier William Thompson– Thomas Hodgskin Louis Blanc– Moses Hess– Karl Marx Friedrich Engels– Ferdinand Lassalle William Morris– Mary Harris Jones Daniel De Leon– John Dewey Eugene V. Debs– Enrico Barone Ben Tillett– Bertrand Russell Robin Hahnel– Michael Albert
Organizations First International (International Workingmen's Association) Second International Third International (Comintern) Fourth International Socialist International World Federation of Democratic Youth International Union of Socialist Youth World Socialist Movement
Religious socialism Buddhist– Christian Islamic– Jewish left
Regional socialism African socialism– Arab socialism Titoism– Maoism Labour Zionism Third World Socialism Left-wing nationalism
Related topics Criticism of capitalism Class struggle– Democracy Dictatorship of the proletariat Egalitarianism– Equality of outcome Impossibilism– Internationalism State-owned enterprise Left-wing politics– Marxism Mixed economy– Nationalization Socialization of production– Planned economy Proletarian revolution Reformism– Socialism in One Country Socialist market economy Post-capitalism– Trade union Mode of production
v – d – e

Socialists consider a free association the defining feature of developed socialism. A free association would displace the state apparatus in socialism; the role of this association in would be directing the processes of production and the administration of things. This is in contrast to the state in non-socialist and capitalist society, which is the government over people via coercive action.^[7] The free association represents a coordinating entity for economic activity that is concerned with administrative decision-making and the flow of goods and services to satisfy demand.^[8] Socialists consider this a defining element of mature socialism; however many socialists are of the opinion that such an arrangement will follow a transitional phase of economic and social development, such as market socialism.

[edit] Critical views

The anarchist and communist concept of free association is often considered utopian or too abstract to guide a transforming society. It would be in the dream plane. However, it is valued by present trends such as the free software movement, and considered as a basic principle in the relationship between software developers of free softwares.

Others reply this critic asserting that free association is not a utopia, but a emancipatory exigence which necessarily come from the very material condition which is the proletariat (i.e., deprivation of property and a constant social struggle against the submission and deprivation that it causes, and that puts them against the state and capital). However, the trends that advocate a transition (especially social democracy and Marxism-Leninism) postpone it for a more or less remote future, pushing free association so increasingly in the background, in exchange for the task of establishing a transitional phase. And as the proletariat can have no interest in their own emancipation when it is postponed for the indefinite future, the search for a "transition" is necessarily a task that is not assumed by the proletariat thenselves but by a intelligentsia or political professionals. This culminated in Stalinism (for example, the so-called socialist countries like Cuba, USSR, China) and the present social democratic parties, in which the concept of free association was virtually abandoned. In contrast, the present trends derived from anarchism and council communism understand the free association as the practical basis for the fundamental transformation of society at all levels, from the everyday level (search of an libertarian interpersonal relationship, critique of the family, consumerism, criticism of conformist and obedient behavior ) to the level of world society as a whole (the fight against the state and against the ruling class in all countries, the destruction of national borders, support for self-organized struggle of the oppressed, attacks on property, support to wildcat strikes and to workers and unemployed autonomous struggles).

[edit] Literature

Since anarchist, some Council Communists (mainly the Situationists) and other autonomous communists consider free association as an immediate task for introduction and maintenance of communism, many of them bother to think about its operation, unlike the Leninists and Social Democrats who are more concerned with a "transition".

Some of most important works:

The Humanisphere - Anarchist Utopia (L'Humanisphre - Utopie anarchique, 1857), by the libertarian communist Joseph Djacque. Complete text in French: [4]

The Conquest of Bread (1892), by Peter Kropotkin. Complete text: [5].

A World Without Money: Communism (1975–76), by the French group Friends of 4 Millions of Young Workers . Complete text, in French [6].

Bolo'bolo (1983), the PM Complete text in French: [7] and Portuguese [8].

The thin red line: non-market socialism in the twentieth century (1987), by John Crump, offers an account of the ideas of several trends which considered important the free association. Text in English: [9]

[edit] Quotations

"It follows from all we have been saying up till now that the communal relationship into which the individuals of a class entered, and which was determined by their common interests over against a third party, was always a community to which these individuals belonged only as average individuals, only insofar as they lived within the conditions of existence of their class – a relationship in which they participated not as individuals but as members of a class. With the community of revolutionary proletarians, on the other hand, who take their conditions of existence [...] under their control, it is just the reverse; it is as individuals that the individuals participate in it. [...] Communism differs from all previous movements in that it overturns the basis of all earlier relations of production and intercourse, and for the first time consciously treats all natural premises as the creatures of hitherto existing men, strips them of their natural character and subjugates them to the power of the united individuals. Its organization is, therefore, essentially economic, the material production of the conditions of this unity; it turns existing conditions into conditions of unity. The reality, which communism is creating, is precisely the true basis for rendering it impossible that anything should exist independently of individuals, insofar as reality is only a product of the preceding intercourse of individuals themselves." Marx (German Ideology) s:The German Ideology/Section 12

[edit] References

1. ^ Kropotkin, Peter. The Wages System. 1920. Also available: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/kropotkin-peter/1920/wage.htm
2. ^ Now and After: The ABC of Communist Anarchism, New York: Vanguard Press, 1929. [1]
3. ^ Manifesto of the Communist Party, section "Proletarians and communists"
4. ^ the Civil War in France, Marx
5. ^ The Thin Red Line: Non-Market Socialism in the Twentieth Century, John Crump (1987) [2]
6. ^ Eclipse and Re-Emergence of the Communist Movement, by Francois Martin and Jean Barrot [3]
7. ^ Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, on Marxists.org: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch01.htm: "The first act by virtue of which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society–the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society–this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The State is not –abolished.– It dies out."
8. ^ The Alternative to Capitalism, on WSPUS.org: http://wspus.org/in-depth/the-alternative-to-capitalism/