A Noble Cause Betrayed ... but Hope Lives On
Pages from a Political Life, by John Boyd
Chapter 1f
Editor of Canadian Tribune
When I returned home, in the fall of 1958, Leslie
Morris asked if I would be willing to take on the job of editing the
Canadian Tribune. Nelson Clarke was the editor at the time, but they
wanted him to be National Organizer. I was somewhat taken aback by the
offer and a bit frightened by it. I thought it was too big a challenge;
I didn't think I could handle it. But Morris kept twisting my arm and
telling me that he and the other members on the committee would give me
all the help I needed. So I took it on. And I was editor for nine
consecutive years, longer than anybody else, except perhaps for Morris,
who had served longer, but only two or three years at a time. Nobody
else had served that long a stretch, from 1958 to 1967.
In the beginning I found it a greater challenge
than I had anticipated. For the first two years I worked every weekday,
all of Saturday and half of Sunday, to make sure I could cope. But I had
good people on the staff. There was Greg Billings, Bert Whyte (between
his stints in Peking and Moscow), and others. And I received a lot of
support from Morris, when he was leader of the Party, but after he died
and Kashtan took over it became very difficult. Kashian wanted to
control and have a say in everything that was done. For example, when
I'd be in doubt about some serious problem or issue, I'd phone Stanley
Ryerson or Nelson Clarke or Bill Kashtan, sometimes all three, to get
their opinion or advice. Invariably, if Kashtan found out that I didn't
take his advice he would raise the matter with me, sometimes quite
sharply. Which really pissed me off. Finally, as I gained more
confidence, I said to hell with it, I'm not going to consult anyone, I'm
going to go ,by what I think and let the chips fall where they may. And
I told Kashtan that. That's when they decided to make me a member of the
Secretariat, so that every week they could discuss what should go into
the next issue of the Tribune and thus have more control over it.
Party leaders disturbed
Another example. One summer I came back from my
vacation to find Bert Whyte and Greg Billings in the office along with a
young fellow we had hired for the summer as a reporter. He was from
Quebec, although he wasn't French Canadian. As I walked in, Bert said to
me, "I think we have a problem. Take a look at this." And he showed me
the proof of a full-page feature, an interview the young reporter had
with Phil Ochs, the young U.S. singer and songwriter, who was popular at
the time. At one point in the interview, Ochs was giving his opinions
about the different political trends in his country during a certain
period, and when he was asked, "What about the Communist Party?" he
said, "Oh, it was irrelevant." I read the full interview and said, "1
don't see anything wrong with it. Those are Ochs's views. Just add a
footnote saying these are his views and not necessarily those of the
Tribune." So we published it. And that's when the "shit hit the fan."
The Party leaders criticized me for it. Just like in the Soviet Union, I
thought, you had to conform.
Just after U.S. President Kennedy was
assassinated, I wrote an editorial on Kennedy in which I tried to give a
balanced picture and not be totally negative. I quoted some of the
things Kennedy said not long before he died, especially a speech he made
in California in which he said there was a need for more dialogue and
cooperation between nations instead of confrontation and hinted at the
need for some rapprochement with Castro's Cuba. I wrote that this was an
indication perhaps of some new trends, which was proved later, of
course, when Nixon went to China. Again I was sharply criticized for it
by some; on the other hand, some thought it was good.
My trip to Cuba
During my stint on the Canadian Tribune, I
had the opportunity to make two trips abroad. On January 1st, 1961, Bill
Sydney and I were in Havana as representatives of the Party at the
celebration of the second anniversary of the new Cuban revolution. We
had a bit of trouble getting there because, although flights from
Toronto to Havana at that time made a refueling stop in New York, we
weren't allowed to take one of them, because we were on the list of
those who were barred from entry into the United States. So we had to
take the roundabout route via Mexico, which was pleasant enough, because
it gave us a chance to be in Mexico City during Christmas week, a
worthwhile experience in its own right. We did note also that at the
airport, like all the other passengers to Havana, we were photographed
before boarding, presumably for the FBI or the CIA.
Those were heady and exuberant days in Cuba. Only
two years had passed since Fidel Castro and his fellow revolutionaries
had driven triumphantly into Havana after their five-year guerrilla
struggle against the regime of the dictator Batista. During those two
years, many new positive changes were introduced, changes that most of
the population, especially the working poor, enthusiastically welcomed:
slum shanties were bulldozed and sturdy modern individual homes and
apartment buildings constructed to house their former occupants; a
social safety network that gave special attention to the elderly, the
sick and otherwise disadvantaged was implemented; that very year was
declared the Year Against Illiteracy, during which young people were to
sent out to teach all citizens, especially the seniors, how to read and
write.
The demonstration in Havana lasted most of the
day, since more than half a million people took part in the march past
in front of the dignitaries and guests on the podium and then jammed the
huge Plaza of the Revolution to hear Fidel Castro speak. He spoke for an
hour, which we were told was his shortest speech yet, since prior to
that his speeches had lasted as long as five and six hours.
Fidel and Che on the podium
On the podium with Castro was Che Guevara,
Fidel's brother Ratil, and several other members of the original
revolutionary group that landed on the shores of Cuba in 1956. It
included also several leading members of the Communist Party of Cuba,
like Bias Roca, its general secretary, the two Escalante brothers, and
Carlos Rafael Rodriguez, the editor of the newspaper Granma. You
see, after Castro came to power, he made a power-sharing arrangement
with the Communist Party and the Revolutionary Directorate, a student
anarchist organization, so the leaders of the three centres worked
together in what was called the Integrated Revolutionary Organization,
and Anibal Escalante, one of the Communist Party leaders, was made its
organizational secretary. This in spite of the fact that earlier, when
Castro and his colleagues first landed in Cuba on the ship "Granma," the
Communist Party considered them "liberal adventurers" and didn't think
they would get anywhere. Not long after the landing, Carlos Rafael
Rodriguez joined the Castro group and was with them until their victory.
After the demonstration, I had an interview with
Rodriguez, and he related to me some of his experiences and shared with
me some of the problems he had as editor of Granma. The irony is
that three months after that celebration, Anibal Escalante and a large
group of his colleagues were charged with taking orders from Moscow and
trying to place their men in key positions in the new government —
virtually spying for Moscow. Later they were tried and convicted.
Escalante was sentenced to 15 years, and 36 members of the group were
given sentences ranging from 12 years in prison to two years' house
detention.
Another trip to Moscow
In 1962, on the occasion of the 50th anniversary
of the publication of Pravda, the Soviet Communist Party central
organ, the -editors of all Communist Party newspapers were invited to
Moscow to take part in celebrating that event. And for this event,
Moscow pulled out all stops, so to speak. First there was a ceremonial
gathering in the Kremlin's ornate and luxurious St. George's Hall at
which almost all the editors were invited to give toasts, and which
seemed to go on forever. This was followed by a sumptuous banquet at
which Nikita Khrushchev made an hour-long off-the-cuff speech, prior to
which we were told not to take notes. In the speech he lauded the
achievements of the Soviet Union, related how it was helping out the
third world, and boasted of its military advances and of the "surprises"
it had for U.S. imperialism. He didn't say what those surprises were,
but since this was just a few months before the Cuban missile crisis, he
must have had the secretly installed missiles there in mind.
My interview with Khrushchev
While the toasts were being delivered in St.
George's Hall, I found myself sitting next to Khrushchev's wife and had
a nice chat with her in Ukrainian. Also sitting nearby was the old civil
war hero and Stalin's faithful toady, Voroshilov. Khrushchev's wife
introduced me to him and we chatted briefly, but when I spoke to him in
Ukrainian, he replied in Russian, even though he is supposed to be a
Ukrainian. Later, I was told I could have 10 minutes with Khrushchev (I
don't know who had suggested it), which was a very pleasant experience.
We spoke to each other in Ukrainian, he asked me a lot of questions
about the life of Ukrainians in Canada and was surprised that I spoke
Ukrainian as well as I did, even though I was born in Canada. The next
day all the editors were taken on a cruise on the Volga, which included
a visit to a nuclear plant.
As I said, I had held this job for nine
consecutive years and was pretty tired — not only physically, of the
day-in-day-out of putting out the paper, but also of the continuing
hassle I had with the Party leadership, especially with Kashtan.
[ Continued ... ]
[ Top ] [ Table of
Contents ]
Copyright South Branch Publishing. All
Rights Reserved.
www.socialisthistory.ca ▪
|