www.newsandletters.org












 NEWS & LETTERS, November 2004

Woman as Reason

Struggle against Shari'a in Canada

by Mary Jo Grey and Terry Moon

A horrific threat to women in some Middle Eastern and African countries--Shari'a law--is now haunting the lives of Muslim women in Canada. But not without a fight.

It started when the province of Ontario passed the Arbitration Act in 1991, diverting some civil and family law cases to arbitration by religious groups, supposedly to relieve their overloaded court system. Then, in the fall of 2003, promoters of political Islam (Islamic fundamentalism) created the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice as arbitrators in what would be a Shari'a court in Muslim communities in Ontario. This is the first time Shari'a has legal validity in a western country.

The driving force behind this, Syed Mumtaz Ali, proclaimed: "a Muslim who would choose to opt out [of Shari'a]...would be guilty of a far greater crime than a mere breach of contract--and this would be tantamount to blasphemy or apostasy,"crimes punishable by death in many countries. So much for choice. Under Shari'a a woman's testimony counts for half of a man's; daughters receive half the inheritance of sons; men are automatically awarded custody of children over seven; women have no right to choose a husband, clothing, a residence, and cannot travel without their husband's consent. As we saw in Nigeria last year, only a global outpouring by women's and human rights groups saved Amina Lawal from execution by stoning, after she was convicted of adultery by a Shari'a court.

Considering that reality, it was shocking that organizations like the Canadian Council of Muslim Women were not consulted about having Shari'a courts in Canada. Council President Alia Hogben said her group is strongly opposed and is lobbying hard for Ontario to change the Arbitration Act. Opposition has been growing worldwide, with demonstrations in September in Ontario and British Columbia, and at the Canadian embassies in England and Germany.

One of the strongest voices of opposition is Homa Arjomand, coordinator of the International Campaign Against Shari'a Court in Canada. As a human rights activist in Iran, she barely escaped (on horseback through the mountains) with her husband and two young children in 1989, before she could be arrested, imprisoned and executed by the Islamic fundamentalist government.

Today, as a social worker near Toronto, she helps abused Muslim women and children. According to Arjomand, battered women coming from Islamic countries--who often don't speak English, lack education and are isolated in their communities--receive no government help, and, again, face oppressive Shari'a. "We must separate religion from the state," she insists.

DANGER OF CULTURAL RELATIVISM

Some charge that supporters of Shari'a are getting away with these abuses by using cultural relativism. Iranian feminist Azar Majedi, speaking in Canada at a demonstration on International Women's Day (IWD), spoke for many there: "Culture has come to take precedence over human rights, equality, liberation, rights of individuals, children's rights and women's rights--concepts and issues which have long been argued and have prominence in modern and civilized civil societies....There is NO justification for assigning such a prominent status to culture, which overshadows any sense of justice, equality and freedom and the achievements of long battles fought by freedom-loving people and socialists for more than two centuries."

While acknowledging that Iranian women have been "victims of political Islam," she declared: "But we are not mere victims. We belong to a vibrant, dynamic, strong, and progressive movement, which has fought political Islam not only in Iran, not only in Iraq, and not only in the Middle East but also here in the West. We have raised the banner of freedom and equality not only for women but for humanity and are fighting to push back religion to its rightful place--that is to the private sphere."

GLOBAL WOMEN'S MOVEMENT

The internationalism of this movement is seen in how women at IWD contended: "It is an extension of the same movement in Iraq [to impose Shari'a in Canada] that has threatened to kill Yanar Mohammed of the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq."

An outspoken supporter of the Arbitration Act is B'nai Brith Canada, a Jewish human rights organization. Exactly whose human rights they are interested in was brought out by Evelyn Brook, president of the Coalition of Jewish Women for the Get (divorce) in Montreal, who expressed grave doubts that Jewish women could trust a Jewish religious court.

The former Ontario Attorney General Marion Boyd is finalizing her review of the Arbitration Act, at the request of Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty. Her report and suggestions for changes is due as we go to press. At the same time, Salam Elmenyawi, head of the Muslim Council of Montreal, is holding talks with the Quebec justice department to bring binding Shari'a arbitration to Quebec.

Why is this cancer spreading in the West? The truth is that religious fundamentalism is not a foreign doctrine that's relegated to the Middle East, Africa, or developing countries. It resides in style in the U.S. and other so-called "Christian countries." This is seen, for example, in how the U.S. and the Vatican happily join hands with repressive theocratic states like Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Iran when it comes to driving women back to the dark ages, as well as stifling all movements for human liberation. The absolute opposite of such retrogression is not Western governments which easily succumb to arguments of cultural relativism. The absolute opposite is a new truly human society and those committed to fight for it.

  Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons