www.newsandletters.org












NEWS & LETTERS, November 2002

Readers’ Views

FIGHTING AGAINST WAR AND FOR A NEW SOCIETY WITH THE IDEA OF FREEDOM

The October 2002 N&L Lead on "Bush's war against Iraq threatens global disaster" is the most informative analysis I have read or heard about Bush's permanent war. It hits the nail on the head when it points out that focusing a critique solely on U.S. oppression/war leaves one unprepared to deal with the betrayal of the mass of people seeking freedom within the countries oppressed by dictators. History is littered with the betrayal of those fighting for freedom in the "third world."

Longtime subscriber, Kansas


The October Lead mentioned the "quick defeat of the Taliban." Bush considers this a success. But aside from the military defeat, what exactly was successful about the mission in Afghanistan? I wonder how the people there feel about his "success."

Anti-war youth, Memphis


We are deeply alarmed that the most powerful nations in the world continue to rely on military force to achieve their global political and economic goals--while eroding the standard of living, the environment and the security of people throughout the world.

Military action against Iraq would first and foremost affect the long-suffering civilian population. Since the l991 Gulf War, an estimated 1.5 million Iraqis have died as a result of shortages of food and medicine under sanctions.

The world cannot be made safe from weapons of mass destruction by countries that possess vast arsenals of such weaponry, bombing other nations for allegedly pursuing the same weaponry. Bombing sites that could contain nuclear, chemical or biological weapons hold the potential for a global human and environmental catastrophe.

Alarmed, Canada


In your October Lead you state that the UN is providing no opposition to Bush's drive to war with Iraq. I believe they have provided some opposition, but it is both weak and, in the end, non-viable. This is because the other big powers, Russia and China in particular, want to take advantage of the U.S. doctrine of a pre-emptive strike and "war against terrorism" to use against their own opposition at home. In the end they will no doubt capitulate to the U.S. after they "negotiate," but so far they haven't. And what about pre-emptive strikes from India or Pakistan? Or Israel? Or who knows what others will arise? Bush is playing with fire--nuclear, biological and chemical--in his drive to U.S. world-imperialist domination.

Activist, Oregon


In thinking of the costs of invading Iraq, I decided to calculate the cost to each person in the U.S. If the total costs of war and reconstruction comes to $150 billion and we use the 2000 census figure of 281,421,906 as the population of the U.S., the average cost to each of us is $533.01. If Americans are not already convinced morally against an unnecessary war with Iraq, maybe they could be convinced on a personal level.

Chris, Detroit


I was a little concerned about the Editorial in the October issue calling 9/11 the "largest terrorist attack in history." Is that really true? If you call terrorism attacks on non-combatants, there's a lot of that in recent history, especially Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes, it was in a war, but it was directed against non-combatants.

David Mizuno'Oto, Oakland, Calif.


The shamelessness of the administration's doublespeak is amazing. They plan to invade a country, conquer it and impose military rule--and justify it as maintaining "peace"!

Confounded, Memphis


I read the report from British intelligence upon which Tony Blair based his support for the U.S. It gives good information on Iraq but does not support what Blair says. It shows that for a while Saddam has extended his missile range but has a damaged infrastructure for building nuclear weapons. In other words, nothing is imminent. So why is Bush raising such a sense of urgency and why there?  Saddam attack the U.S.? He can't! It was September 11 that enabled Bush to push for this war. But it won't reduce the threat of terrorism.

Radical lawyer, Flint, Mich.


I feel the most important thing for us to do as citizens of this country is to oppose U.S. imperialism. It means fighting your own government. I know the U.S. betrayed the Iraqi people when the Kurds rose up against Saddam after the Gulf War and many Iraqis had to flee. It's hard to disassociate U.S. imperialism from reactionary regimes everywhere. It's why I think the best thing to help the people of Iraq is to stop U.S. imperialism.

Anti-war youth, Chicago


The Marxist-Humanist category of "two worlds in every country" is important for the anti-war movement. The administration has the illusion that everyone will fall behind them because of September 11. But our demonstrations here are getting a lot of support, especially from women, Blacks, and young truck drivers. We may not hear much in the media about the second world in each country, but the fear of rebellious masses determines a lot of policy. Iraq, Turkey and Iran are all worried about the Kurds' drive for self-determination. Recognizing the category of "two worlds" can help us build the movement.

Activist, Memphis


COMPOUNDED BALI HORROR

In recoiling at the horror of the bombing on Bali and the terrible pictures of burned and bloodied tourists, many are unaware that up to 40% of the victims were local Balinese. For them the horror is compounded because, unlike the international victims taken to the best medical care Australia has to offer, the Balinese victims were left with the chaotic conditions of the overstretched hospitals in the capital, Denpasar.

Almost none have any medical insurance or government support to help them recover. Nor will there be any help for the thousands whose livelihoods were destroyed. They are desperate for help even for such simple things as antibiotics and burn creams. A relief effort has been started by TAPOL, the Indonesian Human Rights Organization that can be reached through tapol@gn.apc.org. We have to try to counterbalance the unspoken racism that has rendered nearly half of the victims of this tragedy effectively invisible.

Human rights activist, New York


CLOSE DOWN THE SCHOOL OF ASSASINS

It's time to consider going with us to Ft. Benning, Ga., for the Nov. 15-18 weekend vigil to close down the notorious School of the Americas (SOA) that the U.S. Army renamed Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHISC). No matter how vehemently the Army denies its responsibility for the murders of hundreds of thousands of people by its SOA graduates, this institution remains a shameful symbol worldwide of U.S. support for militaries that kill their own people. Those who want information on the protest events can check out the web site at www.soaw.org.

Beth Poteet, Chicago


AN ELECTION SURPRISE

Though it is not yet official at the moment I am writing this, the 90% unofficial count shows ex-colonel Lucio Gutierrez leading the presidential race here in Ecuador. In second place for the Nov. 24 runoff is Alvaro Noboa, heir to a banana fortune and the richest person in Ecuador, with no political experience (a la Ross Perot). Gutierrez was the colonel who supported the indigenous uprising in January 2000. The red baiting has already begun but, barring election fraud, I predict he will win the presidency in November. The candidates of the traditional political parties were all clearly rejected.

Correspondent, Ecuador


MARXISTS & ANARCHISTS

I thought Brown Douglas took a cheap shot at anarchists in the Youth column titled "New anti-war movement?" (October N&L) when he went from a short quote by one anarchist to say, "throughout there is a lack of a vision of the future, of what could be and the forces that could make it happen." This sounds somewhat vanguardist. Where is the solidarity? Marxists and anarchists must unite to fight the capitalists. There are many types of anarchists and Marxists. I expected more from Marxist-Humanists than this.

Anthony Rayson, Illinois


PHILOSOPHIC DIALOGUE

Tom More's "The theory and politics of regression" (October N&L) is a profound contribution to understanding religious fundamentalism as a global phenomenon. As he argues, fundamentalism is not simply a reaction to Western imperialism, but a modern reassertion of the opposition to critical and dialectical thinking.  Because fundamentalism is about privileging "immediate knowledge of a putative truth immunized from critical scrutiny and stepping back from dialectical thinking" its outcome is terror. Any opposition movement that also steps back from dialectical thinking and does not address the internal contradictions of our societies, cannot fight fundamentalism.

Sheila, Los Angeles


The development of fundamentalism is not about how Islam would have developed without western intervention. There is no corner of the world left untouched by western intervention, not only military but specifically the logic of commodity production. That broke through all national boundaries.  The dialectical approach really focuses on how capitalism infects the mind. I hear More saying that fundamentalism is a thoroughly capitalist phenomenon.

Urszula Wislanka, Oakland, Calif.


The Philosophic Dialogue in the October issue illuminates our current situation. If we see it in the context of "the Christian Right's successful reversal of the emancipatory forward ground" gained by earlier decades' freedom movements, how can the Left fight successfully without establishing its own ground of full freedom? To fight on the enemy's ground is to defeat oneself. The search for shortcuts is one way this happens, whether the shortcuts are reducing imperialism to the actions of conspiracies or the broader "anti-theoretical posture" Tom More mentions. We truly need to begin by negating not only U.S. imperialism but all partial and incomplete efforts to negate it.

Franklin Dmitryev, Memphis


MUMIA’S STRUGGLE CONTINUES 

The case of Mumia Abu-Jamal has undergone a sea change recently. He has hired completely different lawyers to defend him but they are encountering resistance in the state and federal courts to hear new evidence. That evidence is a set of affidavits that, if true, prove his innocence "beyond the shadow of a doubt."  The Chicago Committee to free Mumia Abu-Jamal is taking two important actions to intensify an international effort to free him. One is directed at Amnesty International, asking them to create an Amicus Curiae brief and submit it to the federal and state courts that have Mumia's fate in their hands. A second regards an Amicus Curiae brief filed by two locals of the International Longshoremen's Union, N.A.L.C. Golden Gate, National Union of Journalists of the U.K., and two independent local unions in Ukraine. We are asking everybody to file individual joinders to this brief and have their organizations submit them.

Each joinder is an individual filing and we are prepared to pay for four copies and mailing each joinder returned to us. Those interested in helping us can write to CCFMAJ, Box 112, 2421 W. Pratt, Chicago IL 60645 or e-mail us at organizers@chicagofreemumia.org. Since every document costs about two dollars, contributions for postage and copying will be gratefully accepted.

Mumia supporters, Chicago


BRITISH SCENE

The Conservative Party in the UK, the oldest political party in Europe, is at an all-time low. At the end of its recent annual conference, it was casting to find a role. It still retains a membership of about 250,000 but many of its activists are in their 80s. The drift towards the politics of the Countryside Alliance, which appears to be a rump of some of the most reactionary people in British society, suggests its options for survival are limited. It has been outflanked on the right by the Labour Party.  A good time for the Left to grow? Not if the Left continues with the bland old ideas that have proved so untasty in the past.

Patrick, England


CAPITALIST ECONOMICS

Depending on whether the Republicans capture both houses of Congress or not, the Bush defacto regime may or may not be able to continue, with no end in sight, its "war without end."  No doubt, after all the "rogue states" as now defined are dealt with, new "rogue states" must emerge.  Otherwise the structural crisis of capitalism takes over and the whole shooting match enters a fast downfall to its final implosion.  So "war is survival." (I'm enclosing a cartoon I drew to express how I see it.)

Ana Lucia Gelabert, Texas


The Left talks about Enron's greed as what is wrong with capitalism. When I challenged some Leftists that it's not just greed but the internal logic of the system, they said it is true but that they can't put that in their papers. I'm glad N&L does.

Iranian revolutionary, Hayward, Calif.


BARBERSHOP

For weeks, the movie "Barbershop" was number one at the box office. The controversy has helped keep the cash-flow going through the roof. The controversy is about lines concerning Ms. Rosa Parks, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, Sr., which cannot be printed verbatim in any newspapers or magazines, and are censored with a bleep on TV or radio news stations.

Let's compare this controversy in "Barbershop" with the movie "Coming to America" which starred Eddie Murphy and Arsenio Hall, and also has a barbershop scene where there is a debate revolving around Mr. Mohammed Ali changing his name from Cassius Clay. I still remember that scene ten years later. But if the controversy over "Barbershop" is remembered at all years from now it will be because of how much money the studio made. To me this movie should be renamed just "BS" and I don't mean "Bachelor of Science."

George Wilfrid Smith Jr., Chicago


FIGHTING FOR WOMEN'S LIBERATION

I liked the way Maya Jhansi began her article on "After 9/11: What kind of future for women?" (October N&L) with a quote from Rosa Luxemburg and ended it with one from Virginia Woolf. That connects us to women's militant anti-war history and reminds us of Luxemburg's powerful voice. In pointing to the way Bush's coalition in the UN with Libya, Algeria, Sudan, and even Iran and Iraq, was to strike down advances for women on reproductive rights, health care, or anything else concerning women's freedoms, the article made its point strongly that the women's movement needs to "move beyond the UN."

Women's Liberationist, Tennessee


The Street Harassment Project has joined NOW-NY in calling for a federal independent investigation of the way the D.A.'s office handled the case that has come to be known as the 1989 Central Part jogger rape case. We have a stake in making sure that real truth-seeking investigations and prosecutions of crimes against women take place, not ones that are hasty, incomplete, media-driven and play on racist stereotypes.

The D.A.'s office should not be investigating itself in its handling of this case. Among the questions that need to be tackled is whether a continuing investigation could have led to an earlier arrest of Matias Reyes, who has confessed to the crime, and thus prevented any of the five other rapes and one rape-murder to which he has also confessed. And how would it have affected the trial of the five youths who were convicted and saved them from having to spend crucial years of their lives in jail?

The media must also take its share of responsibility for racist stereotyping in this case. Terms denoting animal behavior such as "wolf pack" and "wilding" appeared daily creating an atmosphere of racial hysteria. As women, we want more convictions of rapists, but not those that are career or media driven.

Feminists For Justice, New York


VOICES OF REASON FROM WITHIN PRISON WALLS

This year I will turn 65 in prison. But I am not going to retire and receive the social security that was taken out of my pay for over 30 years. The politicians are now going to send some of the big company CEOs to prison. But doesn't the U.S. social security system do the same thing they did when it takes money from me under false pretenses? The government has more crooks in it than the prison does. The truth is the politicians have been our role models. A lot of us are in prison for doing  just what the CEOs and the politicians did.

65 but Not Retired, Maine


In January 2000, Illinois' Republican Governor George Ryan, citing what he called "a shameful record" of convicting innocent people and putting them on death row, imposed a moratorium on his state's executions, the first of its kind anywhere. By now there is a growing trend away from this barbarism.

In their book, LEGAL LYNCHING, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr., Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., and Bruce Shapiro present an impassioned argument for doing away with the barbaric practice that offers no social or moral benefits to this country or its citizens.  Citing the works of respected academics, historians, theologians and criminologists, they expose the defects of capital punishment. Each chapter advances convincing arguments against the death penalty with well-researched discussions of ineffective attorneys, factual innocence, vengeance, voyeuristic executions and statistical analyses. The book is important reading for anyone concerned with ending capital punishment.

Roger Hummel, Texas


Inmates here used to be used as slave labor to produce commodities at a sub-standard price.  Then Corrections shifted gears. Money was still to be made, but not at the expense of inmate labor. Lengthy sentences began to be handed out like candy and the whole inmate body became the commodity as private prisons were developed. They were placed on the stock exchange and now human suffering is a fast-advancing business as private medical, educational and food service has begun inside of prisons. Did prison conditions improve? Not one iota. Meanwhile, taxes doubled and tripled. Now the uneducated, poor and down-trodden are handed extremely long prison terms in the name of "justice," when in actuality their bodies are nothing more than a commodity like a cow, sheep or pig.

Prisoner, New Mexico


I've been studying your pamphlet EXPLORATIONS IN DIALECTICAL AND CRITICAL THEORY. It is something every young person who is against racism, sexism, and globalization should read because, as Raya Dunayevskaya is quoted in the Preface, "Without a philosophy of revolution, activism spends itself on mere anti-imperialism and anti-capitalism, without ever revealing what it is for."

Prisoner, Michigan


The expanded section of Readers' Views from prisoners in the October issue stood out as a powerful subjectivity, very conscious of how much society's unfreedom is magnified in its prisons.

Retiree, Detroit

Editor's note: Can you contribute to our Donor's Fund, to help send subscriptions and pamphlets to prisoners?

Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons