www.newsandletters.org












NEWS & LETTERS, May 2002     

Column: Voices from the Inside Out by Robert Taliaferro

Capitalism's information virus infects all

by Robert Taliaferro

When was the last time that you witnessed so much news about relatively obscure non-news items?

Since the beginning of the declared war on terrorism there has been no lack of information surrounding every aspect of the action.

Americans, and the world, now know more about the conduct of war than they have ever known, and the media onslaught describing the war's prosecution now borders on overkill.

From any minor scratch received by troops on the ground, to the utilization of multi-million dollar weapon systems, we now get up-to-the-minute information that supposedly lets the public know that their faith in the American leadership is not misplaced, and that their money is well-spent.

Additionally, we now know more about Afghanistan than we know about our own backyards, which is sadly ironic. Had this information been available prior to September 11, it is quite possible that the tragic events of that day could have been avoided.

Unfortunately we have this unique propensity to ignore anything in the world that does not directly pertain to our existence. If attacked in any fashion, we are quick to respond with a sense of emotional furor.

Yet, despite all of its technology and industrial might, the U.S. is relatively naive with an inchoate understanding of the world beyond its borders. In essence, it is a second-rate player when it comes to understanding the theoretical and philosophical context of world views.

Every administration since Reagan's has been defined by that inherent ignorance and American propensity to trust in the concept that "money can solve all problems."

Nearly every tragedy that has befallen American citizens, both home and abroad, can be mapped directly—or indirectly—to policy-makers who have blindly embarked on crusades that equated finance with solutions.

Yet the greatest deterrence to rational actions on the part of those policy-makers has not been economic, or philosophical for that matter. It has been cultural and nationalistic, attempting to imbue American ideas and principles on people in a manner that is as alien to them as Pop Tarts or peanut butter.

In search of public support, policy-makers often act like some virulent plague that runs rampantly though the population, sickening everyone with a deadly disease.

The disease that is spread is capitalism, whose symptoms are as devastating as the most deadly virus: inherent racism and the conditions that make genocide possible, ensure homelessness and hunger, that enhance and support hatred, and that ultimately promulgate some tragedy.

Today the enemy is Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Yesterday it was Noriega or the Duvaliers of Haiti. In each case they were once supported by policy-makers in this country in some capacity. In each case that support backfired.

During the Cold War, nearly every abusive leader in this hemisphere was supported directly, or indirectly, by American policy-makers of the day. The only criterion for that support was an espoused hatred of Communism. Unfortunately, they were not questioned about disdain for their own people.

Who will be tomorrow's puppet? Who will be the next unlikely partner in some newly-stylized freedom campaign? The die is already being cast for the next political failure, as policy-makers vie for public support.

In a letter to Adams, Thomas Jefferson once questioned whether the common man could be trusted with self-government. In a historical irony, it was Karl Marx who was able to answer that question affirmatively. One wonders what both would think today if they were to review the decisions that policy-makers have made over the last few decades?

Of course, Jefferson also noted that a little revolution every now and again was a healthy thing, if for no other reason than to ensure that the leadership was kept honest. Marx would have agreed with that idea.

It is important to be able to view events in order to ensure that the trust of the people is not misplaced. In viewing those events, however, one must be careful that they maintain the ability to discern the differences between factual—as opposed to manufactured and orchestrated—truths. In so doing, one cannot be lulled to sleep by disinformation and propaganda, from either side.

Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons