Column: Women as Reason
November 1998
Sojourner Truth's feminist legacy
by Jennifer Pen
Sojourner Truth's life, legacy and mind have been central to the Women's
Liberation movements of her century and ours. Her bold renaming of herself,
her challenges to white and male authority, and her break with Frederick
Douglass over women's rights after the Civil War, were highlighted by Raya
Dunayevskaya as exemplifying "the vanguard element of the Black dimension"
and "Woman as revolutionary force and Reason" (WOMEN'S LIBERATION AND THE
DIALECTICS OF WOMEN'S LIBERATION [WLDR] 49).
However, the meaning of Sojourner Truth's life is currently being contested
in the academic and feminist worlds. These current debates have been
prompted by Nell Painter's full-length biography, SOJOURNER TRUTH: A LIFE,
A SYMBOL (Norton, 1996). Painter contends that the received image of
Sojourner Truth is a myth, constructed from the writings of 19th century
white feminists (and continued by their 20th century inheritors). Instead
of amplifying Truth's own voice, Painter mutes it by claiming that it is
essentially unrecoverable.
Painter is concerned by what she sees as Truth's malleability into a symbol
for everyone's agenda. She maintains that white feminists use a "colossal
Sojourner Truth...as an electrical presence who terminates debate"
(Painter, 284-285).
Responding to such tokenism could lead readers into an appreciation of
Sojourner Truth's intellect, but Painter goes in the opposite direction:
She often dismisses her subject's thought. In contrast, Raya Dunayevskaya
sees in Sojourner Truth a new kind of person, a new kind of subjectivity,
born in relation to the Abolitionist and Women's Liberationist movements.
Such "an original character...instead of being simply 'one in a million,'
combines yesterday, today and tomorrow in such a manner that the new age
suddenly experiences a 'shock of recognition,' whether that related to a
new lifestyle or the great need for revolution here and now" (ROSA
LUXEMBURG, WOMEN'S LIBERATION AND MARX'S PHILOSOPHY OF REVOLUTION [RLWLKM]
83).
Painter provides a wealth of new details of Truth's life and gives a sense
of the scope of her activities. However, Painter reduces this life to
trivialities. Thus, her adoption of the name "Sojourner Truth" is described
as solely religious, to the utter banishment of the political moment.
Painter trivializes her subject's need to sojourn as a psychological
disappointment in not being a home owner.
How do we hear the meaning of "Sojourner Truth"? What Dunayevskaya caught
from Truth's name and life was the "type of Reason that discloses that
intelligence is related to one's experience and aspiration and is not
merely a matter of literacy or illiteracy. It is the drive to freedom that
determines one's philosophy and that makes one see what Marx meant by
'history and its process." (WLDR 54).
Painter misses that "drive to freedom" by focusing on the ways some white
reformers found Truth to be entertaining. While Painter decries this
racism, she does not offer us Truth's subjectivity or voice as a
counterpoint.
Thus, Painter does not make much of Sojourner Truth's break from Douglass
over the issue of votes for women, when she called him "short-minded" for
sacrificing women's suffrage to the pragmatics of passing the 15th
Amendment. Instead, Painter prefers to pit one Black woman-the powerful
orator and poet Frances Ellen Watkins Harper-against another, Sojourner
Truth, on the basis of Truth's being favored by Susan B. Anthony and
Elizabeth Cady Stanton (223-226). This is an inexplicable strategy which
gives more power to white women intellectuals than to Truth's own powerful
testimony, while dividing Black women.
When Painter reaches a topic she knows better than anyone-the "Exodusters"
who left the South for Kansas in the 1870s and 1880s-she again misreads
Truth's politics. Sojourner Truth had been trying to institute a plan to
move freed Blacks from Washington, D.C. to Kansas immediately after the
Civil War. Painter characterizes Truth's plan as paternalistic: "Freed
people's initiative had no part in it" (236). But when "The Exodus to
Kansas of 1879 upstaged Truth's plan," what happened? Sojourner Truth
"supported it enthusiastically" (Painter 244). Painter misses the dialectic
again, even if Truth caught it. Truth was trying to show her solidarity
with the Black masses, at first creating-as intellectuals sometimes do-a
false blueprint that couldn't work. But even though "the actual movement-an
expression of independent black action-had caught her completely by
surprise" (Painter 246), Truth knows to follow the dialectic of masses in
motion! It is remarkable that an 80-year-old illiterate woman can respond
to history in the making, while her biographer prefers to focus on Truth's
shortcomings.
All people, and all historic figures, are beset by contradictions, but it
is your revolutionary philosophy that dictates how you will lean when a
crisis comes. In the absence of such a philosophy, history becomes merely a
chronicle of events. Painter's biography brings us a wealth of new details,
but they are like puzzle pieces unarranged, with some even maliciously
tossed around the room. To fail to see that the Exodusters movement
demonstrated the movement of the Idea of freedom, which was present in
Truth's mind, too, is to read history as merely
one-damn-thing-after-another. Like many intellectuals, Painter has
succumbed to "the temptation to bring the bigger-than-life" thinker "down
to their size" (RLWLKM 178).
Dunayevskaya always stressed how Truth's importance was grounded in history
and in philosophy. Painter's book is an example of how "the attitude
towards women's struggles seems always to play down women's actions as not
meriting the description 'revolutionary'" (WLDR 80). But it also shows how
"hard of hearing" intellectuals can be when it comes to learning the "new
language of thought, Black thought" as enunciated by Sojourner Truth (WLDR
49). As Black feminist and lesbian Gloria Joseph said, to understand
Sojourner Truth as "a thinker challenges all feminists, especially Black
feminists, to set about the critical, historical contextualization of...her
revolutionary intellect" ("Sojourner Truth: Archetypal Black Feminist" in
WILD WOMEN IN THE WHIRLWIND, ed. Joanne M. Braxton and Andre Nicola
McLaughlin).
CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO NEWS AND LETTERS
|