Column: Black World
November 1998
Fight Right's onslaught in '98 election
Lou Turner
The vicious right-wing assault on what's left of the meager social agenda
of the Democratic Party coalition of civil rights, labor, women's and
social advocacy organizations for the poor and working class this election
year is cause for great alarm. The serious political consequences of a
right-wing Republican sweep in key elections this November seems to have
flown beneath the political radar of Black and left forces. The
demobilization of Black and working class America by Clinton Democrats
virtually assures it.
Called the most "retrograde and ineffectual Congress" in recent memory by
nothing less than the WASHINGTON POST (Oct. 19), the outgoing
Republican-controlled 105th Congress has blocked legislation controlling
the tobacco and managed health care industries, along with legislation to
increase the minimum-wage and outlaw hate crimes.
According to a recently discovered House Republican leadership document, a
section of which is entitled "Presidential Priorities the Congress
Stopped," Republican leaders in the House of Representatives, working with
Senate Majority leader Trent Lott of Mississippi, boasted that their
successful killing of the Hate Crimes Bill was a "win for conservative
priorities."
There is no more damning evidence of how ruling class politics contribute
to the neo-fascist atmosphere now being felt throughout the country than
the Republican leadership's characterization of the Hate Crimes Bill as a
"proposal that criminalizes motive rather than punishes violent crime." In
other words, even after James Byrd is dragged to his death and decapitated
in Jasper, Texas, because he is Black, even after Matthew Shepard is
brutally beaten to death in Wyoming because he is gay, Republicans feel it
their bounded duty to protect the rights of home-grown neo-fascists from
having their motives criminalized by "big-government."
It is all too easy, here, to now separate the horrors of this neo-fascism
in American life from the more mundane anxieties over the economic crisis
that the working class faces. This is the pitfall that all too many social
movements and political organizations stumble into. As depraved as these
inhuman acts of violence are, no less ominous is the deepening economic
crisis, whose full effects are sure to be felt between now and the next
election cycle, and how an even more entrenched Republican-controlled
Congress is sure to respond to them.
While Congress and the President are already bailing out "too-big-to-fail"
corporations and financial institutions, responding to the effects of the
economic crisis on the conditions of life and labor of the working class
could be left in the reactionary hands of an even more right-wing Congress
after the November elections.
In its campaign to gain a veto-proof Senate, the Republican Right has
especially targeted women Democrats elected in the 1992 election, liberal
women like Carol Moseley-Braun in Illinois, Barbara Boxer in California,
and Patti Murray in Washington state. Though Bill Clinton's sexual
misadventures have emboldened the Right to intensify their reactionary
onslaught, their aim being to complete the retrograde "Contract [on]
America" they foisted upon the nation as a result of their 1994 mid-term
election victory, Clinton is not the impetus.
Washington's politics of "sex, lies, and videotapes" only appears to be the
Right's excuse for politics these days. Something more ominous lurks behind
the bourgeoisie's tabloid politics. Rolling back the modest social agenda
that "liberal" Clintonistas like Senator Moseley-Braun sponsored, sometimes
with the support of Bill Clinton and often without it, is the over-riding
aim of the Right. Just as Reagan and Bush's stacking of the federal courts
with conservative judges was calculated to have far-reaching consequences
into the next century, so the aim of the Republican Right is to lock up the
Congress for the forseeable future.
Earlier this year, in an unguarded moment of radical candor, Julian Bond,
following his election as chairman of the board of the NAACP, described the
aim of this political retrogression as "the demobilization of effective
insurgent politics, the depoliticizing of discussions of our gross
maldistribution of income, and the adoption of reactionary and punitive
social policy" (POVERTY & RACE, July/August 1998).
In the Illinois U.S. Senate race, the Republican Right has, without
spending one dime, gotten a multimillionaire banking heir, Peter
Fitzgerald, to take out Carol Moseley-Braun, the only African American in
that lily-white institution, the U.S. Senate. Fitzgerald is spending $10
million of his own money to do just that, after having spent $6 million in
a primary race in which even Republican state leaders like Illinois
Governor Jim Edgar labeled him an extremist they couldn't support.
What they have no trouble supporting, however, is Fitzgerald's reactionary
anti-labor, anti-civil rights, anti-woman and anti-human needs agenda. It
was not coincidental that the reactionary columnist George Will's weighing
into the Illinois race with an attack column against Moseley-Braun in the
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES coincided with Fitzgerald's attack ad campaign. Will sees
Illinois as "the bellwether state," in which the defeat of Carol
Moseley-Braun would represent a giant step toward the Right gaining a
veto-proof Senate.
The growing economic crisis and authoritarian police state that targets
Black and working class communities has more often than not been aided by
Clinton and the Republican-controlled Congress. Which is why we cannot
ignore the positions Senator Moseley-Braun has taken as a Democrat
following the lead of her party's leader, Bill Clinton.
Her 1996 trip to visit the late Nigerian military dictator General Sani
Abacha came at a time when a growing movement around the world was
solidarizing with the Nigerian working class trying to throw off Abacha's
despotic rule. Senator Moseley-Braun has supported Clinton's
"law-and-order" crime policy of putting 100,000 more cops in Black
neighborhoods already under siege by the police at the very moment when a
grassroots anti-police brutality movement is gaining momentum in Black and
Latino communities across the country. The same can be said for her support
for lowering the age at which juveniles can be treated as adults in the
criminal justice system.
The Black community has by no means ignored these and other instances in
which Black politicians like Moseley-Braun act in ways that go against the
interests of Black working people. Indeed, the latest travesty of Black
political betrayal was the Sept. 15 House vote for a resolution calling for
the extradition of the Black revolutionary Assata Shakur from Cuba, a
reactionary resolution that members of the Congressional Black Caucus
either intentionally or ineptly voted for. (Find details and the lively
discussion and campaign in support of Assata Shakur on the Internet.) The
Black community also painfully recognizes the seriousness of the present
moment and what's at stake in the '98 election.
CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO NEWS AND LETTERS
|