B U R E A U O F P U B L I C S E C R E T S |
Kenneth Rexroth, Classics Revisited; More Classics Revisited
[1968, 1989]
This two-volume series of essays is itself a true classic. I dont know any
other work of literary criticism that can match it. Rexroth often manages to
say more of interest in an essay of three or four pages than acclaimed critics
do in book-length studies. This is because his concerns are not narrowly
literary. In reexamining these basic
documents in the history of the imagination he is actually recapitulating the
whole range of human experience all the
potentials of humanity (as
yet largely unrealized), all the
tragedies, all the beauties, all the follies, all the
different ways of looking at life.
A
list of the 100 books discussed in the two volumes, along with some
70 others
that he planned to discuss but never got around to, can be found
here.
Some of the Classics Revisited essays are online at this site, but I cannot urge you too strongly
to get your own copy of the whole thing. Its the sort of reference you want to have at your
fingertips.
[Rexroth
list of ten influential books]
Clifton Fadiman and John S. Major, The New Lifetime Reading Plan
[1997]
I read Fadimans
The Lifetime Reading Plan when it first came out (1960)
and it served me as a very helpful guide to the Western classics. The
selection was good, though fairly conventional, and the brief
remarks on each recommended work were
useful introductions aimed at reasonably literate but not necessarily well-read
readers. Two later editions slightly revised the list without changing the
general orientation.
The fourth edition (1997), retitled The New Lifetime Reading Plan,
includes for the first time a significant selection of Asian classics (plus a
few from Africa and Latin America), added by co-author John S. Major. This makes
the book considerably more recommendable as a general guide. It is not on the
same level as Classics Revisited, but it may serve as a useful supplement
to it, providing information about a number of basic works that Rexroth
did not discuss.
In lists such as these the choices of the greatest ancient works tend to be
nearly unanimous. Its harder to get as good a perspective on works that
are closer to our own time, and different peoples choices are subject to lively
disagreement. So it is here: I have no quarrel with most of Fadiman and Majors
earlier selections, but many of their twentieth-century picks seem pretty
lightweight to me perhaps worth reading, but hardly meriting the status of
essential classics.
I have reproduced the Fadiman-Major list
here.
Charles Van Doren, The Joy of Reading
[1985]
Van Doren discusses many of the same Western classics featured in the
Fadiman-Major book, but also includes a number of personal favorites of more
varied merits.
Philip Ward, A Lifetimes Reading: The Worlds 500 Greatest Books
[1982]
A generally good selection with brief commentaries. A serious drawback is the
books inconvenient organization. The 500 books are almost randomly divided up
into 50 different years, on the supposition that a reader might want to read
ten of them per year (even if that were the case,
it is hard to imagine a reader who would not prefer
to make her own decision as to which ten they might be), and there is no general
listing, chronological or otherwise, enabling the reader to see at a glance what
authors have been selected, or what titles have been recommended by a particular
author, or about a particular topic, or from a particular country or period.
Mortimer Adler et al. (ed.), Great Books of the Western World
[1952/1990]
As the title indicates, this 60-volume set is limited to Western classics.
The editors rationale for this decision (and for the innovative educational curriculum
that was largely based on these same works) was that the works in the Western
tradition comprised a more or less coherent Great Conversation in which the
writers and thinkers, however divergent their views, debated with each
other across the ages in largely the same terms; whereas there had been no
comparable level of dialogue with the various Eastern traditions. This perhaps
once-valid argument no longer seems so convincing. In the last few decades we
have seen an accelerating global unification that, for good and ill, has tended
to bring all cultures together. A person can no longer be considered educated
who is not familiar with the basic works of the East as well as the West.
The translations in the first edition (1952) were
often poor. This has been largely remedied in the second edition (1990).
Although the set includes major works of literature, it is strongly
idea-oriented and contains a greater proportion of difficult works of
philosophy and science than most other lists of classics. Most readers will feel
no need to own all these works, and the ones they do want are available in
cheaper editions, in some cases with better translations. The main reason to get
the Great Books (assuming you come across a reasonably priced used set)
is for its two-volume Index of Ideas, The Syntopicon (see the
entry at the end of the “Western Philosophy section).
I have reproduced the Great Books table of contents
here.
Harold Bloom, The Western Canon
[1994]
Bloom is an extremely prolific and erudite critic. He is usually worth
reading when he discusses the classics. In my opinion he is less reliable when
he discusses more modern works.
William Theodore de Bary et al., A Guide to Oriental Classics
[3rd
ed. 1989]
This book lists approximately 100 major works in the Islamic, Indian, Chinese
and Japanese traditions, with annotated bibliographies of different translations
and background material.
I have reproduced the table of contents
here.
Raymond Queneau (ed.), Pour une Bibliothèque
Idéale [1956]
In the early 1950s Queneau asked several dozen French authors and critics to list the
hundred books they would choose if they had to limit themselves to that
number. This book (long out of print) reproduces all of their responses
and
tabulates their votes to arrive at an overall top 100 list.
I have reproduced that list
here. It is naturally much more weighted
toward French works than the other lists mentioned here, and may introduce you
to some French writers who are not so well known among English speakers. It
should also remind us of how narrowly Anglocentric (or Eurocentric) our own
lists undoubtedly appear to those in other countries.
Ford Madox Ford, The March of Literature
[1938]
A leisurely, idiosyncratic and worldly-wise journey through the whole world
of literature by the great novelist and critic.
Edmund Wilson, Essays and Reviews [1895-1972]
Wilson was an independent writer and critic who was very widely read without
being at all academic. Axels Castle, which includes illuminating essays
on Yeats, Proust, Joyce and Gertrude Stein, is his most well known volume of
literary criticism, but his other collections of essays and reviews are almost
always interesting, even when he is delving into minor and obscure authors that
you are unlikely ever to read: The Triple Thinkers, The Wound and the Bow,
The Shores of Light, Classics and Commercials, The Bit Between My Teeth.
Most of them have recently been collected in two Library of America volumes.
Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western
Literature [1946]
Penetrating examinations of different modes of consciousness and perception
reflected in brief passages from Homer, Petronius, Dante, Boccaccio, Rabelais,
Shakespeare, Cervantes, Stendhal, Virginia Woolf and other great writers. The
most famous example is the opening chapter, Odysseus Scar, where Auerbach
contends that Homers narration of the recognition scene
between Odysseus and his childhood
nurse reflects a different sense of time among the ancient Greeks.
R.H. Blyth, Zen in English Literature and Oriental Classics
[1942]
Elucidates the Zen elements in
Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Dickens, Cervantes, and other sometimes even more
unexpected places. This is one of the books that have most significantly
influenced my views of literature and life.
Henry Miller, The Books in My Life
[1952]
Essays on a diverse range of books and authors,
including a list of the 100 books that most influenced him. Millers opinions are
very erratic and he goes off on all sorts of nonliterary
tangents, but I recommend this book for its lively and
iconoclastic spirit.
Mortimer Adler and Charles Van Doren, How
to Read a Book
[1972]
This is not about how to read in the minimal
sense, but how to read well; how to approach intellectually difficult works so
as to understand what the author is really saying; how to read “actively” (for
real understanding) as opposed to passively (for mere information). It is so full of good
practical advice that I can hardly begin to summarize it here. Suffice it to say
that if you have not read this book you are probably not getting the most out of
your reading, no matter how well-read you may be.
This co-authored edition is distinctly better than the earlier one authored
by Adler alone.
Mortimer Adler, The Paideia Proposal
[1982]
In the 1930s Mortimer Adler and Robert M. Hutchins introduced a new style of
education at the University of Chicago. Textbooks and lectures were largely
eliminated. Instead, students gathered in small groups to read and discuss
classic texts, learning how to determine just what was being said and how to
articulate their own responses to it. The role of the teachers was primarily to
facilitate the discussions. (How does this authors view
differ from the previous author we read? What aspects do you
disagree with? On what grounds? . . .)
This program
continued until the 1950s, but it met with numerous
social and academic resistances
and ultimately failed to make much of a dent in American higher education. Adler
concluded that it might be more effective to direct his efforts to an earlier
stage. The Paideia Proposal outlines his ideas for a holistic liberal
arts education beginning in grade school. Two subsequent volumes, Paideia
Problems and Possibilities and The Paideia Program, go into more
detail. Some of Adlers other writings on education are collected in
Reforming Education.
Personally, I am dubious about the possibility of a meaningful educational
reformism within the present society. But if nothing else, the above-mentioned books
contain some good critiques of the existing educational system and give some
hints as to what a more fully educated life might consist of.
For those who may be interested, there are two small colleges that carry on a
great books program substantially like what Adler and Hutchins had in mind:
Shimer College (my alma mater) and
St. Johns
College. A recent crisis at Shimer is discussed
here.
David Denby, Great Books: My Adventures with Homer, Rousseau, Woolf, and
Other Indestructible Writers of the Western World [1996]
A middle-aged film critic goes back to school for two semesters of great
books discussion courses. This book includes some good observations on the recent
culture wars over the Western Canon.
Richard D. Altick, The Scholar Adventurers
[1950]
Intriguing accounts of various literary discoveries and detections
unearthing long-lost manuscripts, exposing literary forgeries,
solving mysteries about authors, etc.
Language and Translation
Ive always found just about any books about language to be interesting,
whether they deal with the origins of words, the colorfulness of slang, the
difficulties of translation, or the decipherment of ancient
writings. Here are
a few that you may enjoy: Mario Peis The Story of Language, Bill
Brysons Mother Tongue: English and How It Got That Way, James
Essinger’s Spellbound: The Surprising Origins of English Spelling, H.L. Menckens
The American Language (one-volume abridgment, ed. Raven McDavid), Lewis
Thomass Et Cetera, Et Cetera: Notes of a Word Watcher, Simon
Winchesters The Meaning of Everything: The Story of the Oxford English
Dictionary, Ernst Doblhofers Voices in Stone: The Decipherment of
Ancient Writings, John Chadwicks The Decipherment of Linear B, Eric
Partridges many works on slang, etymology, etc.
Some interesting books on literary translation: Theodore Savorys The Art
of Translation, William Arrowsmith and Roger Shattuck (ed.), The Craft
and Context of Translation, Reuben Brower (ed.), On Translation,
Robert M. Adamss Proteus: His Lies, His Truth, William Radice and
Barbara Reynolds (ed.), The Translators Art, Burton Raffels The Art
of Translating Prose. The different views are often quite contentious. The
Radice-Reynolds book, for example, is a collection of essays by different
translators of Penguin Classics, whereas the Raffel book caustically attacks
what he sees as the flabby and pedestrian quality of most Penguin translations.
The arguments in favor of various types and degrees of literal renderings or
freer adaptations, colloquial or formal styles, etc., are never-ending because
there are no perfect translations, only more or less successful approximations.
Such debates may seem more interesting to those who know one or more foreign
languages, but I think they are actually more important for those of you who
know none, because they make you aware of the sorts of things that are lost or
distorted in translation.
Incidentally, Ive found Collins-Robert to be the best French-English
dictionaries. I use the huge two-volume Super Senior, but there are
large, medium and small one-volume editions that will suffice for most purposes. For those interested in
refining their French, I recommend perusing books of false cognates
(words that look the same but actually have different meanings), such as
Kirk-Greenes French False Friends or Thody and Evanss Mistakable
French.
[Rexroth
essay on literary translation]
Section from Gateway to the Vast Realms: Recommended
Readings from Literature to Revolution, by Ken Knabb (2004).
No copyright.
Bureau of Public Secrets, PO Box 1044, Berkeley CA 94701, USA
www.bopsecrets.org knabb@bopsecrets.org